Chhattisgarh High Court rules cash-in-hand from a preceding year’s balance sheet cannot be taxed as unexplained money under Section 69A in a subsequent year.
Sikkim High Court held that order of Assistant Commissioner (GST) denying budgetary support claim is liable to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of.
The ITAT Delhi quashed the reopening of an assessment for Rudra Buildwell Homes Pvt. Ltd., citing a lack of proper sanction. It also deleted a Rs. 20.25 crore addition, noting it constituted a double taxation.
The ITAT Delhi has ruled that an entire amount of accommodation entries cannot be taxed. It reduced the commission rate to 0.4% in the case of a taxpayer.
ITAT Mumbai rules that 100% disallowance of alleged bogus purchases is unsustainable. The court directs taxing only the profit element after adjustments.
Madras High Court didn’t entertain the writ as refund application filed without debiting extent of refund claim amount from Electronic Credit Ledger. Accordingly, writ dismissed as mandatory requirement of filing refund application not complied.
Where there exist conflicting test reports regarding conformity of imported goods to standards, the proper course was to allow the importer to respond to the show cause notice with all supporting documents, and for the authority to decide after affording a hearing whether provisional release under Section 110A could be granted.
Where CoC, in exercise of its commercial wisdom, rejected all resolution plans and approved liquidation with 100% voting share, NCLT must order liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 33(2) of IBC.
Assessee could not file GST returns under Section 39(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 for about six months due to reasons beyond control, but was willing to comply with all pending formalities under Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Conversion of MEIS shipping bills to the DEPB scheme was permissible where bills not ‘free shipping bills as the scale of examination under both schemes was similar and the non-examination of goods could not be attributed to the assessee.