Punjab & Haryana High Court directs GST authorities to decide Mahadev Steel Industries’ plea for unblocking ₹33.8 lakh ITC under Rule 86A within one week.
The Court upheld ITAT and CIT(A) findings that jewellery cash sales on the eve of demonetization were genuine and supported by invoices and stock records, dismissing Section 68 addition of ₹6.61 crore.
Agra ITAT deleted addition under Section 68, ruling that gifts from sisters (Sharad Maheshwar) were genuine. The Tribunal held the department cannot reject gifts solely because the donor’s tax return was not scrutinized.
NCLT admitted a Section 7 IBC petition by 125 investors after finding default on assured returns under an illegal investment scheme, declaring moratorium and appointing an IRP.
The Tribunal sent the case back to the Assessing Officer after finding that documents proving investment sources and expenses were not examined earlier. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication after affording hearing.
Nagpur ITAT remanded Vijay Peshane’s appeal to the CIT(A) for fresh review of addition under Section 6a9A. The assessee claimed miscommunication led to a failure to appear before the appellate authority.
Agra ITAT remands A.Y. 2018-19 bogus sales addition case to CIT(A), holding ex parte dismissal without merits discussion violates Section 250(6) and natural justice.
The ITAT ruled that tax authorities cannot deny the S.115BAB benefit after a detailed S.143(3) scrutiny order confirms the assessee as a manufacturer. The judgment emphasizes procedural consistency, overturning the CPC and CIT(A) orders.
The Tribunal remanded the case for de novo assessment to verify the reporting of cash deposits made during demonetisation under the assessee’s second PAN, citing a lack of proper opportunity for hearing.
The ITAT Agra set aside an ex-parte order dismissing a tax appeal, ruling that the CIT(A) must adhere to Section 250(6) by providing a reasoned order on the merits of the additions, even if the assessee is non-cooperative.
