Madhya Pradesh High Court held that steel grip insulating tape is an insulator and liable to be taxed under Entry 50 Part – II Schedule – II of the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002 [M.P. VAT Act] @ 5%. Accordingly, writ allowed.
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs R.K. Swami Singh (Manipur High Court) Manipur High Court held that appeal is not maintainable since value of alleged seized gold is below the minimum threshold limit for filing an appeal i.e. Rs. 1 Crore as per instruction dated 02.11.2023. Accordingly, appeal dismissed. Facts- On 20.06.2014, the respondent herein was […]
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of expenses purely on adhoc basis without rejection of books of accounts or without pointing out any specific deficiencies is not justifiable and liable to be set aside. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad partially upholds PCIT’s revision in Torrent Investments case, focusing on Sec 14A disallowances while ruling on capital loss and CSR deductions.
The Kerala High Court dismissed a tax petition by a retired Subedar, ruling it lacked territorial jurisdiction. The court stated that a bank account in Kerala does not confer jurisdiction when the entire tax assessment cause of action arose in Jharkhand.
The Gujarat High Court orders a temporary suspension of GST registration cancellation for Setu Joy Pvt. Ltd., enabling the company to file pending returns after clearing outstanding dues and fees.
The Gujarat High Court grants a temporary suspension of GST registration cancellation for Deep Chemicals, allowing the company to file pending returns after depositing outstanding dues and late fees.
ITAT reaffirmed that goodwill is a depreciable intangible asset and clarified that amendments under Finance Act operate prospectively, not retrospectively.
The Delhi High Court has decided to hear a writ petition filed by Hybon Technologies, which challenges the tax authorities’ jurisdiction to scrutinize Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims while processing a refund application. The court overruled the preliminary objection of the department and will consider the core legal issue.
AO was bound to follow the CBDT circular 19/2019 (F. NO.225/95/2019-ITA.II], DATED 14-82019 and the omission/dereliction was anathema to the basic feature of our Constitution “Rule of Law”, so his impugned action of passing the assessment order without quoting the DIN was held to be arbitrary exercise of power and therefore, invalid.
