NCLT Chandigarh held that application u/s. 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for the initiation of the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor [Hoshiar Nirvair Tractors Private Limited] stands approved as no resolution plan was received even after publication of Form G twice.
ITAT Mumbai held that CIT(A) is not vested with any power to summarily dismiss the appeal on account of non prosecution. CIT(A) remains under statutory obligation to dismiss appeal on merits. Accordingly, matter remanded back to CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
Held that the liability of the corporate guarantor is co-extensive with the principal borrower, and accordingly, both the principal borrower and corporate guarantor are equally liable for the default. Accordingly, CIRP application u/s. 7 of IBC allowed.
CESTAT Mumbai held that re-classification of goods and demand of differential duty based on re-testing report without providing the said re-test report to the importer/ assessee is not tenable in law. Accordingly, demand u/s. 28 doesn’t stand the scrutiny of law.
ITAT Chennai dismisses an appeal, ruling that a property sale is subject to a pre-existing equitable mortgage, validating a bank’s action under SARFAESI Act.
Delhi High Court held that one day’s notice for hearing is completely violative of principles of natural justice. Also held that GST department needs to ensure that reasonably sufficient time is granted for furnishing reply. Thus, afforded 30 days time to file reply to GST SCN.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that questioning jurisdiction and authority of collector of Stamps for market value of property transferred under Income Tax Act not permissible since already accepted by petitioner. Accordingly, writ appeal sans merit is dismissed.
The Patna High Court has set aside an order against a brick manufacturer, directing a fresh tax assessment after ruling that the initial order was based on “mere guesswork” without any technical yardstick.
Delhi HC rules advocates cannot be prosecuted for clients’ claims, as verifying the truth of the case is not part of their professional duty.
The ITAT has fixed the fair market value of land at Rs. 60/sq.m. for capital gains calculation and directed the tax authorities to re-examine a taxpayer’s deduction claim under Section 54.
