NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 10 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code seeking own Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] is admitted as the Corporate Applicant is in default of a debt due. Accordingly, writ petition allowed.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 9 of IBC for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against M/s. Kute Sons Dairys Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default thereon established.
Orissa High Court held that contractual dispute cannot be tainted with criminality. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail granted to the company liquidator [petitioner] since insolvency proceedings are pending before NCLT.
Karnataka High Court held that any officer below the rank of Joint Commissioner cannot by himself inspect the premises of any taxable person without authorization from the Joint Commissioner in term of section 67 of the CGST Act.
Calcutta High Court held that cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect on the basis of vague show cause notice not furnishing any details is not in accordance with law. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed and orders cancelling registration set aside.
Rajasthan High Court set aside a customs demand notice, ruling that 14-year delay in adjudication was unreasonable and violated principles of natural justice, citing precedents on need for timely quasi-judicial proceedings.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Agra has deleted a tax addition against Ankur Rice Industries Pvt. Ltd., ruling that salary payable is a genuine business liability.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that the amendment to Section 11(3)(c) by the Finance Act 2022, which reduced the accumulation period for trusts, is prospective. The court granted relief to Sarangpur Talia’s Pole Punch Trust, confirming its right to a six-year window for pre-amendment accumulations.
The ITAT Ahmedabad bench has set aside an order by the CIT(E) that denied 80G approval to a charitable trust, ruling that the matter requires fresh examination.
The ITAT Mumbai ruled in the case of Motilal Oswal Financial Services that while the AO had validly recorded satisfaction for invoking Rule 8D, the disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the actual exempt income, setting a crucial precedent for income tax assessments.
