Follow Us :

Syed Mahaboob Peer

Latest Articles


Section 17(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act is ‘a special policy’ to deal with other inconsistencies

Corporate Law : First of all, let us have a look at the Section 17(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which read as ‘(a) to entertain ...

June 28, 2019 4119 Views 0 comment Print

Prefer an Independent ‘Agreement of Arbitration’

Corporate Law : Whether incorporating the ‘Arbitration Clause’ in any ‘Contract Agreement’ is commendable? OR, the Independent ‘Agreemen...

October 16, 2018 1443 Views 2 comments Print

Pr CIT must issue the ‘Certificate to Practice’

Income Tax : None will be entitled for appearing / attending / practicing before the Income Tax Authorities without Registering as an Income Ta...

October 13, 2018 3042 Views 0 comment Print

Need for amending Section 116 and Rule 83 of CGST Law

Goods and Services Tax : there is an utmost need to AMEND the Sub-section (2) of Section 116 of the GST Act, to ADD therein, another category like Practici...

October 5, 2018 3180 Views 0 comment Print

Appearance by ITPs as ARs under GST?

Goods and Services Tax : CGST Act stipulates the following categories of persons as eligible to be authorized representatives to appear before GST Officer ...

September 30, 2018 2010 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Posts in Syed Mahaboob Peer

Section 17(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act is ‘a special policy’ to deal with other inconsistencies

June 28, 2019 4119 Views 0 comment Print

First of all, let us have a look at the Section 17(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which read as ‘(a) to entertain – (i) complaints where the value of goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees twenty lakhs but does not exceed rupees one crore; and (ii) appeals against the order […]

Prefer an Independent ‘Agreement of Arbitration’

October 16, 2018 1443 Views 2 comments Print

Whether incorporating the ‘Arbitration Clause’ in any ‘Contract Agreement’ is commendable? OR, the Independent ‘Agreement of Arbitration’ is better?

Pr CIT must issue the ‘Certificate to Practice’

October 13, 2018 3042 Views 0 comment Print

None will be entitled for appearing / attending / practicing before the Income Tax Authorities without Registering as an Income Tax Practitioner with the CIT.

Need for amending Section 116 and Rule 83 of CGST Law

October 5, 2018 3180 Views 0 comment Print

there is an utmost need to AMEND the Sub-section (2) of Section 116 of the GST Act, to ADD therein, another category like Practicing Income Tax Practitioners, with the addition of words, which are to read as any Income Tax Practitioner, who hold a ‘Certificate to Practice’ and who has not been barred from practice

Appearance by ITPs as ARs under GST?

September 30, 2018 2010 Views 0 comment Print

CGST Act stipulates the following categories of persons as eligible to be authorized representatives to appear before GST Officer or the Appellate Authority or the Appellate Tribunal on behalf of the Taxpayer:

Whether all the Registered GSTPs need to clear the Examination?

September 19, 2018 21069 Views 37 comments Print

Relax………. With the latest Press Release dated 17th September, 2018, the Date of Examination meant for Confirmation of Enrollment of GSTPs and Online Registration procedure for the Examination,

Introducing An ‘Irritation Free Scheme’ Can Bring In More Income-Tax Payers

April 6, 2017 3738 Views 2 comments Print

For enhancing the number of Income Tax Payers, the following measures have to be taken up at once: (1) Introducing a very simplified & hassle-free ITR Form for the First Time Filers of Return of Income & ensure harassment-free assessment, in the following manner:

Open Letter to Committee set up by CBDT to simplify Income Tax Law to Resolve the issue

November 28, 2015 2266 Views 0 comment Print

The Jurisdictional Commissioners of Income Tax are unable to understand specific applicability of Rule 55 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 in connection/relation with each & every Clause of Subsection (2) of Section 288 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,and are blindly rejecting the applications of aspirants opting to become & be Registered Income Tax Practitioners, under a pretext that though the applicant possess the educational qualifications specified u/s 288(2)(v)/(vi), the applicant has not practiced before the Income Tax Authorities for not less than one year on the date of application

Certificate of Registration as 'Income Tax Practitioner' not mandatory to Represent I. T. Assessees

October 7, 2015 142027 Views 37 comments Print

WHO CAN REPRESENT FOR & ON BEHALF OF INCOME TAX ASSESSEES? As per Section 288(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 there are Eight (8) Categories of Persons eligible to act as Authorized Representatives for & on behalf of the Income Tax Payers/Assessees, as listed below: 1) The Relative or Employee of the Assessee/Tax Payer [vide […]

Understanding Rectification of Mistake U/s. 154

September 12, 2015 22097 Views 0 comment Print

Understanding Rectification of Mistake under Section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961 There is no doubt that anybody can cause/effect/commit a mistake ‘inadvertently’ while reading, understanding, interpreting & writing, or during drafting, dictating, or taking note, translating from shorthand, typing, computing, etc.     Considering this factor, the makers of Income Tax Law have kept open a […]

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031