Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Read the detailed analysis of CPF (India) Private Limited Vs ACIT case where Madras High Court annulled assessment proceedings due to violation of Sec 144B procedure.
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses appeal, denying LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) for bogus scrips. Read the full text of the order.
Kolkata ITAT deletes additions made without examining nature of expenditure, criticizing AO’s careless attitude. Full text of the order available.
ITAT Kolkata held that it is unjustified to assess share capital and share premium as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 merely for high share premium as identities and creditworthiness of the share applicant and genuineness of the transactions duly established.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition u/s. 68 as unexplained cash credit unjustified as assessee has filed all the evidences concerning transactions to establish the identity and creditworthiness of the lenders and to prove the genuineness of the transactions.
Reassessment notice issued under section 148 on the ground that how a newly incorporated company could command a significant share premium, was purely hypothetical and lacked tangible evidence and that could not be a tangible material for arriving at reason to believe escapement of income.
ITAT Mumbai deletes LTCG addition in penny stock case, ruling in favor of Assessee. Landmark decision emphasizes genuine transactions and compliance.
Midway Exim Pvt. Ltd. appeals against ITAT Delhi’s order upholding the addition of Rs 8.18 crores u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appeal challenges the reassessment proceedings, notice issuance, and provides detailed analysis on share application money.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on Section 68, as it clarifies the applicability to unexplained cash credits and purchase costs in Ishwar R Pujara Vs ACIT case.
ITAT Chennai rules in favor of Mahasakthi Mills Pvt. Ltd., stating no cash credit addition when the assessee proves the genuineness of business transactions. Full order analysis.
