Income Tax : Due to any reason, in case the income tax department makes an excess refund to the taxpayer. Such taxpayer will have to return the...
Income Tax : Section 234D in Income Tax Act, 1961 was introduced in the act to cover those situations where the refund was issued to the assess...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that foreign allowance received by a non-resident outside India for services rendered outside India does not fal...
Income Tax : ITAT held that agreement to sell coupled with possession constituted a valid transfer for the purposes of claiming deduction under...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that the receipts from Indian customers for services provided outside Indian Territory, in connection with u...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court judgment on GE Capital vs. DCIT, distinguishing under-reporting and misreporting as separate offenses, resulting ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Anurag Chandra, validating the method of declaring foreign profit after currency conversion. Additio...
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from disaster recovery playout services and disaster recovery up-linking services are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Service (FTS) as envisaged under Article 12(4)(a) of India-Singapore DTAA.
ITAT Kolkata held that expenditure incurred towards interior decoration work of a rented office premises is allowable as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, disallowance of such expenditure unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that as Permanent Establishment (PE) exists, interest income being connected to the PE, has to be treated as business profit under Article 7 of the treaty. Accordingly, expenses incurred has to be set off against the interest income.
ITAT Chennai ruling on consequential and mandatory nature of interest under sections 234A to 234D in case of Iljin Automotive Pvt Ltd vs DCIT
ITAT Bangalore held that legal and professional charges being incurred towards business are allowable as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that to burden assessee with capital gain arising out of transfer of immovable property or an interest in it, the cost of acquisition is necessarily to be established. Here, cost of acquisition of so called right of preemption is considered as NIL. Hence, computation provisions fail, therefore capital gains could not have been calculated.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that draft assessment order u/s 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income Tax Act passed on a non-existent company is null and void.
Due to any reason, in case the income tax department makes an excess refund to the taxpayer. Such taxpayer will have to return the excess refund along with interest payable under section 234D of the Income Tax Act. The present article helps to simplify the interest provisions of said section 234D read will rule 119A […]
Section 234D in Income Tax Act, 1961 was introduced in the act to cover those situations where the refund was issued to the assessee according to intimation U/s 143(1) & later on it was discovered post Scrutiny Assessment that the assessee wasn’t eligible for refund or amount of refund was more than amount refunded after […]
