Income Tax : Explore the legality of issuing a second notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the same assessment year. Unders...
Income Tax : Explore the latest changes in Income Tax laws, including extinguishment of demands, return processing, form amendments, exemptions...
Income Tax : Delve into the provisions of Income Tax Act Sections 153A & 153C, governing assessments after search or requisition. Learn from co...
Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Learn about Section 147 to 153 Income Escaping Assessment and Reopening of Cases Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Get guidance on the p...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : Under the provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961, notices for assessment/reassessment of income of old cases of more than six years fr...
Income Tax : One of the key sources of dispute is the existing arrangement for follow up on audit objections by Internal Audit Party and the Re...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : Assessee was engaged in diamond manufacturing, trading, and windmill power generation, had claimed deductions under sections 35DD ...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur order on Rajesh Kumar Tiwari vs ITO. ITAT sets aside Income Tax reassessment completed without providing fair & reason...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST b...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Gauhati High Court rules that AO names cannot be reflected in notices issued under Section 148 in a faceless manner, reaffirming procedures under Section 151A.
Delhi HC directs obtaining instructions in BT India Pvt Ltd vs PCIT case, discussing dismissal of revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore rules interest income from SBI investments not eligible for deduction under Section 80P. Full analysis of Farmers Coop Society vs ITO case.
Read the detailed analysis of Sumit Maheshwari Vs ITO case where ITAT Delhi deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act due to failure in serving notice.
Learn about the penalty of Rs. 31.83 Lakh imposed by the MCA for issuing shares in physical mode instead of DEMAT mode in the Biogenomics case.
ITAT Kolkata quashes notice under Section 148 as AO fails to verify credible information. Insightful analysis of R.S. Darshan Singh Motor Car Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO.
Gokal Chand Rattan Chand vs. Union of India: Detailed analysis of Punjab & Haryana High Court’s judgment on non-existent tax order & auction.
Calcutta High Court stays Section 148 notice for 2016-17 due to limitation issues and pending appeal. Jurisdictional conflicts lead to stay on further proceedings.
Delhi High Court rules that reassessment actions post-2021 searches must meet the First Proviso to Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, quashing Dinesh Jindal case notice.
Delhi High Court invalidates reassessment proceedings against Samsung India for AY 2002-03, ruling lack of fresh tangible material after 4 years.
