This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Issue of reopening notice u/s. 148 by ACIT-Jaipur illegal as jurisdiction lies with ITO-Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arun Bhardwaj Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arun Bhardwaj Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
ITAT Jaipur held that issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act by ACIT, Jaipur, is illegal and liable to be quashed since ITO-Delhi has jurisdiction over the case of the assessee. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) set aside.
Facts- The assessee is an Individual and was residing in Delhi. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s. 147 of the Act on the basis of information about professional receipt of Rs. 19,75,000/- and credit card bill payment of Rs. 2,89,995/-. Notice u/s. 148 of the IT Act, dated 25.03.2017 was issued and served on the asses...
Author Info
