Income Tax : Discover the key amendments in the Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024, affecting income tax reassessment procedures under the Income-tax Ac...
Income Tax : Delhi HC rules in PCIT Vs Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd., ITA 579/2018, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in tax assessme...
Income Tax : Understand the concept of Updated Return under the Income-tax Act, its necessity, tax implications, and filing process. Get insigh...
Income Tax : Explore Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, detailing search and seizure powers, authorizations, examinations, and rules for a tran...
Income Tax : Explore the Supreme Courts insights on Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing due process. Learn key takeaways, including...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance reports the arrest of a firm's finance head for GST evasion worth Rs 88 crore. Learn about the case and it...
Income Tax : The Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT) has directed re-opening of all cases under the search and seizure label, income-escapin...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that settlement commission, accepting additional income offered as reasonable and giving immunity from p...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune remands the case of Suhas Maruti Dhankude for re-adjudication due to non-adjudication of jurisdictional grounds and fail...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore rules that deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) can't be assessed by double deeming unless the assessee receives a direct b...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that order of PCIT invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act set aside as conditions necessary for invoking S...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition merely on the basis of retracted statement without any incriminating material seized from assess...
Income Tax : Read the order issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Ministry of Finance, specifying the scope of the e-Appeals Sche...
Income Tax : Dispute arose between the Department and the assessees with regard to adjustment of such seized/requisitioned cash against advance...
Delhi High Court halts NFRA proceedings against CA Unnikrishnan Menon, challenging show cause notice for irregularities in Quess Corp audit and TDS claim under Income Tax Act.
Karnataka High Court held that incorrect claim or erroneous claim would not amount to willful evasion. Further, mere fact of not accurate tax, not exact tax or erroneous tax would not lead to the proceedings under Section 276 of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai order in Ankur Power Projects vs ITO. Learn why reassessment proceedings were quashed due to non-application of mind by the AO. Full text available.
ITAT Mumbai held that documents seized from employees cannot be considered as having any evidentiary value and cannot be considered to have trustworthiness, since no other corroborative material was brought on record to support the veracity of the same. Hence, documents seized from employees cannot be relied upon for denying exemption u/s 11.
Delhi High Court rules assessment can be reopened only with incriminating material found during Section 132 search. Details on Shyam Sunder Jindal vs ACIT case.
Explore the ITAT Delhi’s decision in Narinder Singh Punihani vs. DCIT case. No addition under Section 69A for wrist watches absence of bills. Full analysis and conclusion.
Jharkhand High Court drops criminal proceedings under CGST Act, Section 174 IPC. Summon duly replied. Analysis of the case – Satyendra Singh Kushwah vs. State of Jharkhand.
Since the legislature vested the discretion to extend the timeframe solely in the AO, he could not have abdicated that function and confined his role to only making a recommendation to the CIT. CIT had no role in extending the timeframe as the AO was in seisin of the assessment proceedings.
ITAT Mumbai held that receipt of Rs 37 crores of exempt capital gain in a non-descript listed company operated by the accommodation entry provider, who has confessed that he has provided accommodations entries to the beneficiaries, including assessee remanded back to the file of AO for further enquiry.
ITAT Jaipur held that initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAB(1A) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the ground and default on the part of the assessee and also without specifying the undisclosed income on which penalty was proposed to be levied is unsustainable-in-law.
