Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priya Mohan Gurnani Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 715/Mum/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/11/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2010–11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Priya Mohan Gurnani Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that receipt of Rs 37 crores of exempt capital gain in a non-descript listed company operated by the accommodation entry provider, who has confessed that he has provided accommodations entries to the beneficiaries, including assessee remanded back to the file of AO for further enquiry.

Facts- The appellant is an individual assessed to income tax. Search and seizure action u/s 132 of the act was carried on 4/2/2016. Therefore the assessment for assessment year 2010 – 11 to 2014 – 15 were carried out by issuing a notice u/s 153A of the Act and for assessment year 2015 – 16 and 2016 – 17 carried out u/s 153A rws 143 (3) of the act. Various additions were made by AO. CIT(A) confirmed the said additions. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

Conclusion- Assessee in her family as stated to have received Rs 37 crores of exempt capital gain in a non descript listed company operated by the accommodation entry provider, who has confessed that he has provided accommodations entries to the beneficiaries , including assessee, Confirmed by SEBI in adjudication order for same time in which assessee has sold these shares. In our view, a wanderer who does not know anything about the shares, did not attend any meetings of the companies , even do not know the nature of the business of the company, company is not found at the place where notices issued u/s 133 (6) , invest Rs 1 Cr in 2012 and earns Rs. 10 crores in 2015­16 [ her family earns whopping Rs 37 Crores] is really a fantastic story.

Held that even if we ignore the original statement given by the accommodation entry provider and his retraction later on, those evidences still remain which needs to be examined, now, independently to ascertain whether the amount of loan taken by the assessee and the amount of long-term capital gain earned by the assessee is genuine or non genuine. In view of the above facts, we set-aside the relevant ground of the appeal back to the file of AO with a direction to the assessee to show the genuineness of the trade and unsecured loan with respect to the documents found as stated in the statement of various parties, exit entry providers details, Demat agencies and the cash trail found.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031