Corporate Law : Supreme Court landmark judgment in Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni clarifies creditor right...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Company Law : Discover how to lift a bank account freeze due to company strike off. Learn the steps under Companies Act, 2013, to restore your b...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Company Law : Explore the current status of pending cases in NCLT and NCLAT as of August 2024, reasons for delays, and the government's strategi...
Corporate Law : Discover how the latest revisions in CIRP forms by IBBI aim to reduce the compliance burden on insolvency professionals and stream...
Corporate Law : Join the discussion on MCA's proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your ins...
Corporate Law : Explore the impact of the LLP (Amendment) Act, 2021 on Ease of Doing Business, startup encouragement, and the introduction of Smal...
Corporate Law : NCLT Amravati held that application filed by SBI (creditor) u/s. 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of ...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai rules in favor of Piramal Capital, allowing Insolvency Professional Entities to be appointed as Resolution Professiona...
Corporate Law : NCLT Bengaluru held that claims filed at a belated stage after approval of resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) can...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that as per section 32A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Corporate Debtor shall not be held liable fo...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chennai held that once the resolution plan is approved by Committee of Creditors, only limited judicial review is available f...
Corporate Law : Read about the case involving Chetan Patel, an Insolvency Professional, with detailed analysis of alleged contraventions and submi...
Corporate Law : IBBI Disciplinary Committee suspends Sanjay Singh, an Insolvency Professional, for irregularities in the e-auction process. Detail...
Company Law : Explore the order dated 03.02.2024 from NCLT Chandigarh transferring all pending cases from Bench 2 to Bench 1. Detailed analysis ...
Corporate Law : Filling up of 05 (Five) posts of Judicial Member and 05 (Five) posts of Technical Members in the National Company Law Tribunal (NC...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs announces the appointment of new Judicial and Technical Members in the National Company Law Trib...
NCLT Amaravati held that no notice is required to be given to the Personal Guarantor at the stage of appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
NCLT Ahmedabad held that Committee of Creditors (CoC) has power to take commercial decision to undertake or not to undertake related party transaction during CIPR of Corporate Debtors. If in commercial wisdom the CoC has rejected the resolution for payment of salary to the Applicants, the question of reversing the decision cannot be considered.
Jones Lang Lasalle Building Operations Pvt Ltd Vs Celebration City Projects Pvt Ltd (NCLT Delhi) This is an application filed by the real estate allottee to the Corporate Debtor, whose claim was rejected by the Resolution Professional on the ground that she ceases to be a real estate allottee on account of an arbitral award […]
IBC does not bar a related party of the Financial Creditor from submitting a resolution plan for the Corporate Debtor and also, an application based upon over future contingencies or apprehensions was unsustainable.
NCLT Mumbai approved the resolution plan submitted by AM Mining India Pvt. Ltd. for Uttam Galva Steel Limited as the same is not contrary to provisions of section 29A of IBC Code and is in accordance with law
Whether the ‘Operational Creditor’ can change the ‘date of default’ by confining the invoices to a later period, when the Demand Notice under section 8 includes all the invoices from the date of default and the ‘debt amount’ is crystallized based on the invoices.
NCLT Mumbai held that obligations under the Undertaking do not attract the definition of financial debt. A fortiori, an indemnity of the obligations under the Agreement will equally not constitute a financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Code.
NCLT Mumbai held that once the resolution plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority, the management/ownership of the Corporate Debtor shall be considered as fresh, even if the directors/promoters of the Corporate Debtor (MSME) remain the same.
The Corporate Debtor used the services/ items extended and supplied by the Operational Creditor but failed to clear the dues. Accordingly, the Operational Creditor/Petitioner issued Demand Notice u/s 8 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 dated 24.05.2021 in Form 3 thereby demanding for repayment of outstanding amount to the tune of Rs.1,44,07,834/-. Despite receipt of said Demand Notice, the Corporate Debtor neither replied to the same nor repaid the outstanding dues.
NCLT Hyderabad held that dismissed the application of corporate debtors as provisions of rule 43 of the NCLT Rules empowers the Adjudicating Authority, and not to the corporate debtors, to seek production of documents.
