Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh D. Shah Vs Vijay Pitamber Lulla (NCLT Delhi)
Appeal Number : IA. No. 1100/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ramesh D. Shah Vs Vijay Pitamber Lulla (NCLT Delhi)

NCLT Mumbai held that once the resolution plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority, the management/ownership of the Corporate Debtor shall be considered as fresh, even if the directors/promoters of the Corporate Debtor (MSME) remain the same.

Facts-

On perusal of the Application, it reveals that the applicant has prayed for the appropriate directions against the Respondents for causing hinderance in the smooth implementation of the Resolution Plan by not allowing normal operations in the Current Account no. 059311010000010 opened by the Applicant for conducting transactions towards implementation of the Resolution Plan, by not upgrading the asset classification of the Company’s account to “Standard” as per Reserve Bank of India norms and further by not releasing the FDR amount of Rs. 47.65 Lakhs belonging to the Corporate Debtor.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031