Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Finance : Explore FAQs on the recent amendment to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, affecting MSME payments. Learn about applicabilit...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : Explore penalties imposed on Mynd Fintech under Section 89 of Companies Act, 2013 by ROC, NCT of Delhi & Haryana. Understand impli...
Company Law : Stay compliant with our guide on ROC form due dates for the Companies Act and LLP Act. Avoid penalties by filing on time during Au...
CA, CS, CMA : Participate in the review of rules under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Submit your suggestions to the Ministry of Corporate...
Corporate Law : Explore the rapid expansion of solar power in India, its impact on renewable energy goals, and the future outlook for sustainable ...
Corporate Law : Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs draft policy for pre-legislative consultation and a comprehensive review of rules and re...
CA, CS, CMA : ICSI developed separate google forms to obtain the details of such issues so as to sort them for easy redressal. On the basis of t...
Company Law : > Download EMSIGNER and EMBRIDGE BOTH for DSC registration on MCA21-V3 Portal. > Change PIN/ Password of the DSC (For First ...
Company Law : RGPL Commodities Pvt Ltd faces penalties under Section 89(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-6. Total ...
Company Law : GM Elektra Pvt Ltd fined ₹1,88,500 by ROC Mumbai for delayed filing of BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Direct...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies penalizes Paramount Dye Tec Limited for not disclosing trading activity in its MOA, violating Section 4(1)(...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process ...
Company Law : MBL Infrastructure Ltd. faces scrutiny under Section 90 of the Companies Act for non-compliance. Details on adjudicating officer's...
Imposition of Rs. 20 Lakh Penalty for Non-Appointment of Company Secretary (CS) Section 203 of the Company Act of 2013, as amended by Rule 8 Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rule of 2014, mandates that certain classes of companies must appoint key personnel, including a Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer or Manager, a […]
Discover how Zyden Gentec Limited faced an ₹8 Lakh penalty from MCA for not attaching Secretarial audit report (in form MR-3) for financial years 2015-16 and 2016-17, as required by Section 204 of Companies Act, 2013. Details of violation and penalties explained.
In a recent development, the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Jaipur, has taken strict action against M/s INTERLINK EXPORTS LIMITED and its key personnel, Shri NARAYAN TUKARAM BADDI (CFO) and Shri ALOK NARAYAN BADDI (CEO), for their failure to comply with the provisions of Section 204(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. This non-compliance pertains to the […]
Oragem Exim Private Limited faced penalties from MCA for not maintaining a minute book of general meetings, in violation of Section 119 of Companies Act, 2013. Details of the violation and penalties explained.
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s STARNET BREEDING AND RESEARCH FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for failing to comply with section 118 of Companies Act, 2013 read with SS-2 regarding minutes of annual general meetings.
Indira IVF Hospital Private Limited, along with key officers, recently underwent an adjudication process for failing to appoint internal auditors as mandated by Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013. This article provides a detailed analysis of the violation, the arguments presented, and the penalty imposed by the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Jaipur. The case […]
MCA imposed penalties n Gujarat Chinese Enterprises for failing to file e-form INC-20A within due date. A comprehensive breakdown of legal procedures, penalties, and its implications
Discover why no penalty was imposed for failure to file Form DIN-3 in Rajasthan. Get insights into Companies Act, 2013 violation case, and registrar’s decision
The breach relates to the absence of signatures from any directors on the company’s Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021. Following a hearing, penalties were levied: the company was fined Rs. 3,00,000, while each director, Mr. Veerendra Kumar Vishwakarma and Ms. Neelam Gautam, faced fines of Rs. 50,000 each.
Explore implications of violating Section 12(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Delve into an order under section 454 and penalties imposed for non-compliance.
