Company Law : The transition to the new MCA portal disrupted statutory filings due to login, DSC, and payment failures. The key takeaway is that...
Company Law : MCA V3 launches revised MGT-7 for FY 2024-25. PAN, Folio, and validation sheet are mandatory for shareholders; external Excel use ...
Company Law : MCA has updated annual forms MGT-7A and AOC-4 with new requirements for business activity codes, registered office details and sha...
Company Law : A summary of the new MGT-7 annual return form on the MCA's V3 portal, detailing the shift to a web-based system, new disclosure re...
Company Law : Erroneous MCA data classifying Independent Directors as 'Directors' leads to legal issues, prompting a systemic correction to prot...
Company Law : The update addresses repetitive annual KYC filings for directors. It allows filing once every three years, significantly reducing ...
Company Law : The upgraded MCA21 V3 portal processed over 3.84 crore filings in five years and resolved 98% of helpdesk grievances in FY 2025-26...
Company Law : The government has approved new regional and company registries to streamline administration and improve access. The move aims to ...
Corporate Law : SFIO now issues digitally generated Summons/Notices with QR codes and DINs, allowing recipients to verify authenticity online and ...
Company Law : ICSI reports numerous technical issues—including OTP failures, data errors, and DSC problems—on the MCA-21 V3 portal and reque...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Company Law : A director was penalized for holding two DINs in violation of statutory provisions. The key takeaway is that even inadvertent non-...
Company Law : The company failed to conduct the required number of board meetings and exceeded statutory time gaps. The key takeaway is that str...
Company Law : Filing incorrect details in statutory forms attracts penalties even if later corrected. The key takeaway is that rectification doe...
Company Law : The case involved non-maintenance of a functional registered office, evidenced by undelivered official communication. The authorit...
Company Law : The case addressed prolonged possession of two DINs due to an inadvertent mistake. The authority imposed a ₹48,958 penalty, hold...
ROC Kanpur penalized All Time Activation Software and its two directors ₹4,00,000/- for violating Section 134 by failing to file the Director’s Report for FY 2020.
ROC Kanpur issued an adjudication order imposing a ₹3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(f) and 450.
ROC Cuttack imposes a 2,00,000 penalty on DP Financial Corporation of India Limited and its director for failing to maintain a registered office under the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 117(2) for failure to file a board resolution approving loans from a promoter. The order reiterates that all borrowing resolutions must be promptly filed with the Registrar.
MCA V3 launches revised MGT-7 for FY 2024-25. PAN, Folio, and validation sheet are mandatory for shareholders; external Excel use is not allowed.
ROC Kanpur levied a Rs 3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(g) by misreporting director remuneration in the MGT-7 annual return.
ROC Kanpur penalized Chen Junfeng of Zu Moulds ₹50,000 under Section 450 for failing to file the DIR-3 KYC form, leading to DIN deactivation. Director must rectify and pay within 90 days.
ROC Kanpur levied a ₹5 lakh penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY and two directors for failing to file the mandated DIR-12 form after a director’s resignation.
ROC Kanpur imposed a ₹1.5 Lakh penalty on three directors of EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Rule 12A by failing to file the mandatory DIR-3 KYC form.
ROC Delhi penalized a company for issuing its private placement offer letter before filing the required resolution with the Registrar, violating Section 42(3) of the Companies Act. The order highlights that even inadvertent lapses in securities issuance attract penalties.
