Company Law : The transition to the new MCA portal disrupted statutory filings due to login, DSC, and payment failures. The key takeaway is that...
Company Law : MCA V3 launches revised MGT-7 for FY 2024-25. PAN, Folio, and validation sheet are mandatory for shareholders; external Excel use ...
Company Law : MCA has updated annual forms MGT-7A and AOC-4 with new requirements for business activity codes, registered office details and sha...
Company Law : A summary of the new MGT-7 annual return form on the MCA's V3 portal, detailing the shift to a web-based system, new disclosure re...
Company Law : Erroneous MCA data classifying Independent Directors as 'Directors' leads to legal issues, prompting a systemic correction to prot...
Company Law : The update addresses repetitive annual KYC filings for directors. It allows filing once every three years, significantly reducing ...
Company Law : The upgraded MCA21 V3 portal processed over 3.84 crore filings in five years and resolved 98% of helpdesk grievances in FY 2025-26...
Company Law : The government has approved new regional and company registries to streamline administration and improve access. The move aims to ...
Corporate Law : SFIO now issues digitally generated Summons/Notices with QR codes and DINs, allowing recipients to verify authenticity online and ...
Company Law : ICSI reports numerous technical issues—including OTP failures, data errors, and DSC problems—on the MCA-21 V3 portal and reque...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Company Law : A director was penalized for holding two DINs in violation of statutory provisions. The key takeaway is that even inadvertent non-...
Company Law : The company failed to conduct the required number of board meetings and exceeded statutory time gaps. The key takeaway is that str...
Company Law : Filing incorrect details in statutory forms attracts penalties even if later corrected. The key takeaway is that rectification doe...
Company Law : The case involved non-maintenance of a functional registered office, evidenced by undelivered official communication. The authorit...
Company Law : The case addressed prolonged possession of two DINs due to an inadvertent mistake. The authority imposed a ₹48,958 penalty, hold...
ROC Kanpur fined SEN HON LEE TECHNOLOGIES and three directors ₹3,50,000 for violating Section 173(1) by exceeding the 120-day limit between Board Meetings.
ROC Kanpur imposed a ₹40,000 penalty on SEN HON LEE TECHNOLOGIES and directors for violating Section 118/146, stemming from the company’s auditor failing to attend two AGMs.
ROC Kanpur has penalized GORDON HERBERT (INDIA) LIMITED ₹6,00,000 for failing to appoint an Independent Director as mandated by Section 149(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Kanpur levied a ₹55,000 penalty on SEN HON LEE TECHNOLOGIES and 6 directors for continuous failure to comply with Secretarial Standard-1 rules on minute and attendance books.
ROC Kanpur imposed a ₹8,00,000 penalty on GORDON HERBERT (INDIA) LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 177 by failing to establish a mandatory Audit Committee.
SEN HON LEE TECHNOLOGIES and its directors failed to consecutively number pages and record dates of minutes for AGMs held on 31.12.2020 and 30.11.2021, violating Section 118(11) read with Secretarial Standard-2. ROC Kanpur imposed penalties of ₹25,000 on the company and ₹5,000 per officer, highlighting directors’ compliance responsibility.
A small software company faced a maximum penalty of ₹2 lakh for delayed filing of financial statements. The ruling demonstrates MCA’s strict enforcement and timelines for filing under the Companies Act.
ROC Kanpur issues Order PO/ADJ/10-2025/KN/00752, imposing an ₹83,400 penalty on Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Co. and its 5 directors for late filing of FY2024 Financial Statements.
Haiderpur Fertilizer Producer Company Ltd. and its directors were penalized for failing to file Financial Statements for FY 2022-23. ROC Kanpur imposed fines under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, highlighting directors’ personal liability.
Registrar of Companies penalized both the company and its officers for non-compliance with Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013. No response or hearing request was received, leading to automatic imposition of fines.
