Income Tax : Analysis of Sections 87A and 115BAC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, detailing their implications for taxpayers, including rebates...
Income Tax : F&O traders need to know how their profits are taxed. With the ITR return filing date approaching, it is imperative to know how st...
Income Tax : Get answers to common ITR issues and FAQs for filing your tax return for AY 2024-25. Resolve filing errors and understand tax regi...
Income Tax : How to calculate the turnover of Futures & Options (F&O) for taxation purposes, including detailed examples and tax filing require...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed with February 2024 legal obligations & updates in India. From Income Tax to GST, understand forms, filing dates, & s...
Income Tax : Discover comprehensive FAQs on filing ITR-4 (Sugam) for AY 2024-25. Learn eligibility criteria, tax regime options, documents need...
Income Tax : Learn who can file ITR-1, who cannot, necessary documents, and precautions. Understand the process of filing ITR-1 (Sahaj) online ...
Income Tax : Understand tax deduction rules for dividends as per Income-tax Act, 1961 amendments. Detailed guide on TDS rates, exemptions, and ...
Income Tax : Read the inaugural address from Ravi Agrawal, the new Chairman of CBDT, outlining his vision for enhancing tax administration in I...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover comprehensive proposals from The Punjab Accountants Association to improve tax compliance, extend filing deadlines, inclu...
Income Tax : In the case of Anil Champalal Jain vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai), learn why Mumbai ITAT ruled that cash deposits during demonetization alon...
Income Tax : Read the detailed judgment of Bombay High Court in ACIT Vs Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Pvt Ltd regarding TDS deduction on retr...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and ...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : CBDT directs DGIT (Systems) to share income tax information with Telangana's Agriculture Department as per Section 138(1)(a) of th...
Income Tax : Discover the latest Income Tax Act notification under section 138 for Telangana by the Ministry of Finance. Details on the designa...
Income Tax : Explore the latest amendment in the Income Tax Act 1961 by Notification No. 50/2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance. Detailed an...
Income Tax : RBI exempted from Section 206AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, via Ministry of Finance notification dated May 27, 2024. Learn more a...
Income Tax : Get insights on Circular No. 7/2024 issued by CBDT, extending due dates for filing Form No. 10A/10AB under the Income-tax Act, 196...
ITAT Surat held that deduction under section 54B duly allowable in case the nature of land was converted from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose just before transfer of land.
ITAT Mumbai held that that the joint ownership of the property would not stand in the way of claiming exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Amritsar held that interest on FDR’s received by co-operative society by investing in another co-operative society is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that fabrication charges received from Associate Enterprise doesn’t fall under the purview of fees for technical services (FTS) and accordingly not taxable in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that allotment letters issued for purchase of flat should be considered as ‘Agreement to sell’ for the purpose of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without dealing with the request for accommodation and according without hearing the petitioner is in violation of principles of nature justice and hence liable to be set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that recording of satisfaction for initiating penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, accordingly, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not sustained.
ITAT Mumbai held that as there was no malafide or deliberate in action on the part of the assessee in filing the appeal with delay of 387 days before the Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, it was directed to CIT(A) to condone the delay.
ITAT Mumbai held that FCCB i.e. Foreign Currency Convertible Bond expenses included as part of FCCB premium expenses is allowable.
ITAT Kolkata held that AO failed to make required enquiries to go into the question of valuation of shares given by the accountant for the purpose of assessment of income as per provisions of section 56(2)(viib). Accordingly, revisionary power under section 263 rightly invoked.
