Corporate Law : The framework permits liquidation only where the company has not defaulted on debts and can pay liabilities. It ensures a clean an...
CA, CS, CMA : The High Court ruled that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is invalid if such action is not proposed in the original...
Corporate Law : Explains how the 2025 amendment removes going-concern sales from liquidation. Highlights the shift toward speed and finality over ...
Corporate Law : IBBI Regulations 32 & 32A for liquidation: defines asset sale modes and prioritizes selling the business as a going concern to max...
Corporate Law : Understand secured creditor rights under IBC Section 52 during liquidation: relinquish security to the estate or realize independe...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : The issue addressed is ambiguity in authentication and evidentiary value of financial information in insolvency cases. The propose...
Corporate Law : The proposal aligns grievance regulations with the newly introduced definition under the amended Code. It aims to ensure uniform a...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that each and every commercial transaction which has resulted in loss may not be labelled as fraudulent or to hav...
Company Law : The appellate tribunal quashed orders permitting bankruptcy against personal guarantors after a creditor consented to grant additi...
Company Law : NCLT Allahabad held that financial creditor duly established existence of financial debt and default thereon on the part of the Co...
Company Law : The tribunal held that the resolution plan was invalid because several valuable properties were omitted from the Information Memor...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that Prospective Resolution Applicant or unsuccessful Resolution Applicant doesn’t have vested right to challen...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether IBBI must provide data held by a regulated entity. The Authority held that RTI applies only to information h...
Corporate Law : The appeal found that the RTI response was delayed beyond statutory timelines. The key takeaway is that delay breaches RTI provisi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether an RVO could grant conditional enrolment to an unqualified applicant. The authority held that such enrolment...
Corporate Law : The amendment allows financial creditors to directly initiate insolvency with prior approvals, reducing delays. It ensures faster ...
Corporate Law : The study found that most MSME insolvency cases are resolved before admission, highlighting gaps in data and process efficiency. I...
Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Any person who wishes to submit a resolution plan, if he or it does so acting jointly, or in concert with other persons, which person or other persons happen to either manage or control or be promoters of a corporate debtor, […]
Revival of the stressed company may be the primary objective of the Code, but official data show that more companies have gone for liquidation in the new regime so far than the resolution as lenders have failed to endorse any viable plan for their revival. According to the data available on the IBBI website, till the end of June 2018, total 1547 applications for the Insolvency Resolution were filed out of which 977 applications had been admitted into resolution process and of which 91 were closed on appeal or review. Data further reveals that till 30th June 2018, total 136 companies yielded liquidations while only 34 companies achieved resolution.
Introduction The Provisions of voluntary winding up have been removed from the Companies Act, 2013 and are now governed by the IBC, 2016. Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide notification dated 30th March, 2017 notified Section 59 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 which is relating to Voluntary Liquidation of Corporate persons. On the very next day, […]
In a memorable and consequential judgement, in the matter of Nikhil Mehta & Sons (HUF)&Or’s vs M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd (CA No. 811(PB/2018 in IB-02(pb)/2017, it has been upheld that the voting threshold in the IBC are merely directory in nature and that preference can be taken to decision taken by the largest percentage in the Committee of Creditors in case of a deadlock. For a homebuyer or commercial property buyer, both of them involved in this case, the judge made an eventful judgement which approved the appointment of Interim Resolution Professional as Resolution Professional and that agenda items 4, 6 to 9 were also deemed to have been approved by majority of Committee of Creditors
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, experts say, emanated from the noble hearts of the rulers who decided to help those who gave their life savings/assumption of unlimited liabilities based on the beautiful pictures and glib lectures of mostly young kids on flats, villas or dream like palaces but on a razor thin margin of reality. I feel sad but also remorseful that these financial creditors as the courts would start calling them, just got jinxed and most of them did not even file claims as per laid down procedures in above code
A dissenting financial creditor means a fmancial creditor who voted against the resolution plan or abstained from voting for the resolution plan, approved by the CoC. In this background, an issue has been raised whether a financial creditor
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 has brought relief to the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises by relaxing the provisions of section 29A in their favour. It is one of the most significant amendments under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and has a wide impact on the whole insolvency resolution regime.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Board) issued a show-cause notice dated 23rd March, 2018 (SCN) to Mr. Kapil Goel, 205, Naurang House, 21 KG Marg, New Delhi – 110001. Mr. Goel is a Professional Member of the Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI and an Insolvency Professional registered with the Board with registration number IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00625/2017-2018/11081.
t is directed that an IPE shall inform the Board: – (a) within seven days from the date when an insolvency professional ceases to be its director or partner or joins as its partner or director; and (b) forthwith and in any case, not later than 7th September, 2018, if it has failed to inform any cessation or joining of an insolvency professional as its partner or director in the past.
An insolvency professional entity (IPE) is recognised by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Board) under Chapter V of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016, subject to conditions specified under sub-regulation (2) of regulation 13, which reads as under:
