Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Explore February 2025's key income tax rulings covering issues like R&D deductions, secondment taxability, trust exemptions, and d...
Goods and Services Tax : February 2025 GST Case Law Compendium covers significant High Court and Supreme Court judgments on key GST issues. Orders issued u...
Corporate Law : Explore key landmark civil cases in India, including their legal impact on constitutional rights, reservations, governance, and wo...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court quashes order restricting a woman's liberty, stating participation in protests is not sufficient reason to curta...
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceeding u/s. 148 initiated against non-existing company is not sustainable in law in a...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court dismisses writ petition challenging luxury tax assessment, citing the availability of a statutory appeal. ...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court directs NFAC to expedite pending appeals, expressing concern over prolonged delays in taxpayer cases, including a...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court quashes GST order against P. Rajasekaran, citing violation of natural justice. Petitioner granted relief on depo...
Income Tax : Kerala HC dismisses EKK Infrastructure’s writ petition on cross-examination in an income tax case, ruling it premature. Read the...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Petitioner must file the stay petition before the National Faceless Appeal Centre and not before the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner, who has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal/stay petition filed by the petitioner after the National Faceless Appeal Assessment/Appeal scheme came into force.
Crescent Constructions Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (WC) (Kerala High Court) HC held that that Deputy Commissioner of State Tax has misdirected himself in law while deciding to reject the application for rectification on the ground that the petitioner produced the documents in support of the claim for lower rate of tax only along with […]
Hede Ferrominas Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) Firstly, the Petitioner did not bother to file any returns during Assessment Year 2015-16. Secondly, the Petitioner did not bother to file any response to the notice dated 27.03.2021 seeking to reopen the assessment within the time limit allowed to the Petitioner. The Petitioner filed returns […]
Shekhar P. Vernekar Vs Commissioner of State Tax (Bombay High Court at Goa) 1. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner on this petition which assails an order dated 30 July 2021 passed under Section 53 of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 read with Rule 55 of the Rules whereby Commissioner of […]
S A Traders Vs GST Officer (Andhra Pradesh High Court) We have gone through the impugned show cause notice and order for cancellation of registration and found force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, for, both show cause notice as well as the order of cancellation of registration are dubious enough and […]
RMSI Private Limited Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) Since in the present case, the impugned order has been passing without issuing a show cause notice / a draft assessment order which has been mandated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act, the impugned assessment order dated 8th September, 2021 issued under Section 143(3) read […]
Rockland Media And Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) The petitioner is challenging the non-grant of transitional credit under Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner’s counsel submits that the writ petition can be disposed of […]
Graphic aids Vs Sales Tax Officer (Calcutta High Court) As stated by the learned Advocate for the appellant that sum of Rs.16,51,924/- has been recovered after the writ petition was dismissed, we feel the interest of revenue has been sufficiently safeguarded as more than 50% of the total dues has already been recovered. Therefore, the […]
ITAT has erred in holding that the entire payments received by the Assessee from its Indian Customers on account of Centralized Services viz. sales and marketing, loyalty programs, reservation service, technological service, operational services and training programs/human resources do not constitute ‘Fee for Technical Services’ as defined under Section 9(l)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or ‘Fee for included services’ as defined under Articles 12(4) (a) of the Indo-US DTAA.
Commissioner- Shri Raju Shakthivel demanded a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/ i.e.@ 10% of the demand of Service Tax, through conduits for a favorable order in the said appeal.
