Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court recent judgment highlights the alarming misuse of the POCSO Act, where cases are filed due to family objections t...
Corporate Law : J&K&L High Court quashes money laundering case against Farooq Abdullah, citing absence of a scheduled offence under the Prevention...
Corporate Law : Jharkhand HC directs the state to use its Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants allegedly from Bangladesh in six districts...
Corporate Law : Punjab & Haryana HC confirms that the Armed Forces Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the legality of a ‘displeasure award’ g...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC rules that relatives of a husband cannot be charged under Section 498A IPC solely for advising a wife to tolerate cruelt...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC sets aside dismissal of GST appeal for delay, remands case to the appellate authority for fresh consideration despite th...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC grants interim protection to a petitioner alleging misuse of GST credentials for ITC claims, pending further investigatio...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that amount payable has been quantified before 30th June 2019 and hence eligible to avail benefit under Sab...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that settlement commission, accepting additional income offered as reasonable and giving immunity from p...
Goods and Services Tax : Rajasthan HC ruled that appeals should be considered on merits, even if filed late, quashing a CGST order dismissing an appeal as ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
Read the full judgment of Umang Mahendra Shah Vs Union of India by Bombay High Court, ruling that an order under Section 148A(d) without Section 151 sanction is unlawful. Learn more about the implications.
Madras High Court quashes GST penalty imposed on Kompress India, citing procedural errors and misinterpretation of GST rules. Vehicle detention deemed unlawful.
Delhi High Court held that the receipts from Indian customers for services provided outside Indian Territory, in connection with use or right to use of process or equipment by the assessee company, cannot be taxed as royalty as per section 9(l)(vi) of the Income Tax Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court held that FIR, registering offence u/s. 304-A, 34 of the IPC, against managing director of the company on account of failure in putting safety signs on either side of culvert so as to prevent any accident of road user justifiable.
Calcutta High Court held that payment made during the course of search cannot be said to be voluntary payment. Such payment made cannot be retained by the department as acknowledgment in GST DRC-04 not given.
Jharkhand High Court held that the delay in filing the appeal without any condonation of delay application is a defective one and hence appeals dismissed as grossly barred by limitation.
Bombay High Court held that upto 1 April, 2005, the expression ‘built up area’ would exclude the balcony area and are not to be included while computing the built up area of the residential units, in housing project eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act.
Petitioner states that mega Exemption Notification No.25/2012 as amended by notification No.13/2013 provides for exemption in case of services provided by a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or Sector Skill Council.
Calcutta High Court sets aside an order under Section 74(9) of the GST Act, remanding the case due to proceedings held after the taxpayer’s death. Key implications outlined.
Calcutta High Court held that coal cutting or mineral extraction and lifting them up to the pithead are essential integral processes and are part of mining operations and hence taxable only from 01.06.2007. No service tax is leviable on such activities prior to the said date.
