Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how IMS makes accepted invoice records the basis for ITC eligibility, strengthening compliance, fraud detecti...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how the GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is insufficient to invoke Section 74 witho...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does not automatically establish tax evasion or justify proceedings und...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue concerns confusion regarding the purpose and sequencing of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filings. The key takeaway is that GSTR-1 s...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI clarified that ITC wrongly reversed under Table 4(B)(1) instead of Table 4(B)(2) can still be reclaimed within statutory time...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government introduced reforms such as e-invoicing and auto-population of data in GST returns. These measures improve accuracy,...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI writes to CBIC requesting a one-week extension for the September 2025 GSTR-3B due date, citing the Diwali festival period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Important change in Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 24-25 - Taxpayers can now report ITC of previous financial year that was claimed in ...
Goods and Services Tax : BCAS requests extension of GSTR-3B filing and payment deadline for Sep 2025, arguing the original date of Oct 20 coincides with Di...
Goods and Services Tax : Due to severe floods in Maharashtra, MCTC has requested a three-day extension for the GSTR-3B filing deadline, citing hardships fa...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Network has issued an advisory introducing significant system enhancements in GSTR-3B beginning with the January 2026 tax peri...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory clarifies that from November 2025, auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B cannot be manually edited. Any corre...
The High Court quashed a GST demand where part of the liability arose from belated ITC and part from return mismatch, directing fresh adjudication in light of retrospective statutory amendments.
Explore how optimising working capital through January 2026 GSTR-3B updates transforms financial management and compliance.
The High Court quashed both adjudication and appellate orders after finding that GST return data was not examined. The matter was remanded for fresh decision with opportunity of hearing.
The GST portal has revamped GSTR-3B filing to improve interest calculation, ITC usage, and reporting accuracy. Taxpayers must verify auto-filled data to ensure correct compliance.
The Court held that issuing two interest demands for delay in filing GSTR-3B for the same period amounted to duplication and double taxation, and quashed the second order.
The GST portal now adjusts interest using minimum cash ledger balance during delays. Taxpayers must still verify and self-compute the final interest liability.
GST Network has issued an advisory introducing significant system enhancements in GSTR-3B beginning with the January 2026 tax period, primarily impacting interest computation, tax liability reporting, and input tax credit utilization.
The Court ruled that filing GSTR-3B returns and paying tax nullifies best judgment assessment orders under Section 62. Interest liability for delayed payment, however, was left intact.
Explains how a credit note rejection led to excess GSTR-3B tax without IMS visibility. The key takeaway is that system adjustments can occur silently, increasing supplier risk.
The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specifically alleged and proved. In the absence of these ingredients, the entire GST proceeding is without jurisdiction and must fail.
