Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how IMS makes accepted invoice records the basis for ITC eligibility, strengthening compliance, fraud detecti...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how the GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is insufficient to invoke Section 74 witho...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does not automatically establish tax evasion or justify proceedings und...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue concerns confusion regarding the purpose and sequencing of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filings. The key takeaway is that GSTR-1 s...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI clarified that ITC wrongly reversed under Table 4(B)(1) instead of Table 4(B)(2) can still be reclaimed within statutory time...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government introduced reforms such as e-invoicing and auto-population of data in GST returns. These measures improve accuracy,...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI writes to CBIC requesting a one-week extension for the September 2025 GSTR-3B due date, citing the Diwali festival period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Important change in Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 24-25 - Taxpayers can now report ITC of previous financial year that was claimed in ...
Goods and Services Tax : BCAS requests extension of GSTR-3B filing and payment deadline for Sep 2025, arguing the original date of Oct 20 coincides with Di...
Goods and Services Tax : Due to severe floods in Maharashtra, MCTC has requested a three-day extension for the GSTR-3B filing deadline, citing hardships fa...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Network has issued an advisory introducing significant system enhancements in GSTR-3B beginning with the January 2026 tax peri...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory clarifies that from November 2025, auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B cannot be manually edited. Any corre...
Jayanthi Plastics (Defunct) vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2: Madras High Court rules it impermissible to reopen an issue in a subsequent notice already decided in a previous order.
Learn how Madras High Court mandates a 10% pre-deposit to contest tax demand discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. Full judgment included.
Tax dispute arose from GSTR discrepancies. Proposal confirmed sans petitioner’s input. Entire liability withdrawn from bank. Opportunity given for appeal.
In a verdict, Madras HC sets aside a GST RCM liability order due to inadvertent errors in GSTR 3B filing, remands for reconsideration. Full text of judgment included.
In Tvl. B.L. Collection Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Madras High Court allows contesting GST demand due to cancer diagnosis, requiring 10% pre-deposit. Full judgment included.
Explore Section 18(6) of CGST Act regarding GST reversal on capital goods sale. Analysis of Rule 40(2) vs. Rule 44(6) methods & reflection in GSTR forms explained.
Delhi High Court directs re-adjudication of a CGST Act order due to lack of natural justice principles. Full text of the judgment provided.
In Roshan Fruits India Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Madras High Court directs GST Dept to dispose of rectification petition regarding ITC availed within 1 month.
Discover if it’s possible to declare GST credit notes in returns after November 30th. Get insights into the legal provisions and practical implications in this analysis.
Explore implications of depositing GST via PMT 06 before filing GSTR-3B. Learn about tax payment deadlines, interest liabilities, and process of tax deposit and utilization by government.
