Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that High Courts require proper notice, recorded reasons, and application of mind before GST registration can...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gauhati High Court held that GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns may still be restored after the statutory re...
Goods and Services Tax : High Courts have held that GST registration cannot be cancelled through mechanical or checkbox-style orders. Authorities must disc...
Goods and Services Tax : GST registration is not always linked to turnover. This guide explains the categories of businesses that must register under GST i...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn when GST registration is mandatory, how turnover thresholds work, and when voluntary registration is beneficial. The guide e...
Goods and Services Tax : The certificate clarifies that dealing and investment in securities are outside the scope of GST. Companies engaged solely in secu...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation highlights ambiguity in whether the ₹2.5 crore ITC threshold should be annual or cumulative. It emphasizes th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government informed Parliament that GST thresholds remain as revised in 2019. Any further increase depends on a fresh recommen...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities identified thousands of fake GST registrations created using forged credentials, involving large-scale tax evasion. Th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance reports on fraudulent GST registrations, detailing the scale of tax evasion and the measures being impleme...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court restored GST registration after finding return defaults occurred during the COVID period, subject to payment of ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gauhati High Court set aside a GST registration cancellation after finding the order contained no reasons and was not a speaki...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC held retrospective cancellation of a supplier's GST registration alone cannot justify denial of ITC. Fresh assessment wa...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court restored GST registration subject to payment of outstanding GST dues, interest, late fees and penalty within pre...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that extensive documentary evidence, audited books, supplier confirmations and banking records established the g...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory explains that registrations will be automatically suspended if bank account details are not furnished within 30 days....
Goods and Services Tax : GST Rule 14A introduces a simplified registration scheme for small taxpayers with monthly output tax liability under ₹2.5 lakh. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Finance Ministry issues Fourth Amendment to CGST Rules 2025 introducing e-registration, new Rule 14A, and updated GST forms effect...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarifies that storing and supplying goods from a third-party warehouse in another state requires a separate GST registration...
Goods and Services Tax : Trade notice outlines GST registration application grievance redressal process for central jurisdiction in Panchkula Zone. Email i...
The High Court set aside retrospective GST registration cancellation after finding that the show cause notice failed to specify the default period or dues, violating natural justice.
The High Court set aside GST registration cancellation where fraud was alleged without evidence or particulars. It held that vague notices and bald orders violate natural justice.
Clarifies the fast-track GST registration process under Rule 14A. The key takeaway is approval within three working days for eligible, low-risk applicants—not a guaranteed same-day right.
Reversal ordered due to cancelled registration was set aside once the cancellation itself was undone. The ruling reaffirmed the linkage between valid cancellation and ITC reversal.
The court held that cancellation for six months’ non-filing could be revoked where the explanation was genuine. Restoration was allowed subject to strict compliance with return filing and payment conditions.
The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition against cancellation of GST registration as an effective statutory remedy existed. The taxpayer was directed to seek revocation before the proper officer.
Rajasthan High Court held that appellate authorities cannot extend limitation beyond Section 107 of CGST Act, but condoned delay as the petitioner had sought registration cancellation and reasonably missed the portal order, directing appeal hearing on merits.
The High Court ruled that ITC cannot be reversed when the supplier was registered at the time of purchase and the transaction was genuine. The key takeaway is that buyers are not responsible for a supplier’s future non-compliance.
The Court set aside cancellation of GST registration after finding that it was based solely on an invalid field visit report without witnesses or proper procedure. The ruling emphasizes that unilateral inspections cannot justify cancellation.
The High Court allowed restoration of GST registration cancelled for six months’ non-filing of returns. It held that authorities must consider revocation if the taxpayer clears dues with interest and late fees as per Rule 22(4).
