The E-Way Bill is a critical component of GST. Read our Latest e way bill News and Updates, E-Way Bill Articles to know in detail about e way bill system, e way bill registration, the applicability of Electronic Way Bill (E Way Bill), Generation of E Way Bill Number, Validity of Eway bill etc
Goods and Services Tax : Discover the essentials of the E-way Bill system, its generation process, requirements, and exceptions. Learn how it facilitates s...
Goods and Services Tax : Is a 200% penalty justified under Sec 129 for e-waybill non-generation due to negligence? Explore implications and legal insights ...
Goods and Services Tax : Stay updated with recent GSTN advisories on portal enhancements, manufacturer info, and the launch of E-way Bill 2 portal. Learn a...
Goods and Services Tax : जीएसटी एक्ट में धारा 129 नियम 138 गुड्स/वाहन को रोकना, �...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court rules in M/s. Falguni Steels v. State of UP case, penalties cannot be imposed for mere technical errors witho...
Goods and Services Tax : Important update from NIC: E-Way Bills for B2B and B2E transactions require mandatory e-Invoice link for e-invoice enabled taxpaye...
Goods and Services Tax : NIC issues advisory on HSN codes for E-Way Bills. Learn the changes for B2B and Export transactions. Implementation from Feb. 2024...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the three categories of E-Waybill transporters, and the crucial role of verifying IDs. Learn to use 'Get GSTIN' and 'Ge...
Goods and Services Tax : 2 Factor Authentication is mandatory for taxpayers with AATO Rs 20 Crore and above from 20th November 2023. Users are requested...
Goods and Services Tax : New requirement for 2-factor authentication for taxpayers with AATO above 100cr from 15/07/2023. Learn about implementation & regi...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC rules a human error in GST e-way bill does not imply tax evasion, quashing penalties against Uttam Electric Store. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court orders reconsideration of Silk Junction vs Deputy State Tax Officer case over GSTR 1 and e-way bill mismatch....
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC upholds tax and penalty on Anil Rice Mill for wrong ITC claims under GST, emphasizing the burden of proof lies on the...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court rules no penalty for human error in E-Way bill. Case details and legal context in Uttam Electric Store vs. St...
Goods and Services Tax : Summary of the Calcutta High Court decision in Rajda Industries vs. State of West Bengal regarding the E-Way bill penalty dispute ...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the new E-Way Bill 2 Portal by NIC, offering independent generation, synchronization, and Criss-Cross operations for seaml...
Goods and Services Tax : Telangana's Commercial Taxes Department requires e-Way bills for interstate movement of sensitive commodities like petroleum and n...
Goods and Services Tax : West Bengal GST update: E-Way Bill requirement raised to Rs. 1,00,000+, and no E-Way Bill needed for job work. Notification 03/202...
Goods and Services Tax : E-waybill is required for Job Worker also within West Bengal and the Revised E-waybill limit within West Bengal is now Rs. 50,000 ...
Goods and Services Tax : TNGST Act, 2017 - Tvl. Mahindra & Mahindra Exemption from generation of e-way bill for the movement of vehicles for the purpose ...
CBIC has Proposed 6 improvements in e-way bill generation with effect from 16.11.2018 which includes Checking of duplicate generation of e-way bills based on same invoice number, CKD/SKD/Lots for movement of Export/Import consignment, Shipping address in case of export supply type, Dispatching address in case of import supply type, ‘Bill To – Ship To’ transactions […]
Article explains What a taxpayer should do if he don’t have ‘Transporter Id’ but want to enter and generate ‘Part-A slip’, When to extend the validity of E Way Bill, What should be done if PIN code is shown as invalid, What to do if the total invoice value does not match with the sum […]
As the complete details to be filled up in Part-B of the E-way Bill were supplied on 25.05.2018, the goods were not liable for seizure on 26.05.2018.
It is also directed that if the petitioner complies with Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the goods detained shall be released to him forthwith.
Against the order dated 30.11.2017 the petitioner has an statutory efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 109 A of the Rules.
Petitioner has equally efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the penalty order under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. It is left open to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy available to him under the law. We are not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage.
Sabitha Riyaz Vs Union of India (Kerala High Court) The petitioner, a trader, transported natural rubber. After generating e-way bill, she sent a consignment to Uttarakhand, with all the relevant records. But it was seized by the State Tax Officer, Uttarakhand, the additional 11th respondent. The ground for detention is that in the e-way bill the […]
Introduction: What is MSME? In accordance with the provision of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) are classified in two classes
Surprisingly, neither the mobile squad authority nor the appellate authority appreciated the claim of the petitioner that it is due to mistake or human error the vehicle number (particularly last two digits) are mentioned different which in the instant case are 83 in place of 38. This Court is unhappy with the conduct of the authorities and it is nothing but a clear cut case of harassment of the petitioner/dealer.
Singh Tyres Vs State Of U.P. And Another (Allahabad High Court) From perusal of the record, we find that the goods were transported from one place to another within the State of U.P. and were accompanied by the requisite documents and requisite E-Way Bill has also been produced by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 […]
