Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violations and appeal process included.
Kalpakkam Nidhi Ltd fined Rs. 20,000 for non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of Companies Act. IT order mandates payment within 90 days, with appeal options available.
Adjudication order issued to Jasbir Singh for violating Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013. Penalty of ₹2,00,000 imposed by ROC Punjab and Chandigarh.
Adjudication order under Companies Act, 2013 for M/s Aasvas Nidhi Ltd for non-compliance with Section 158. Penalty imposed on company and directors for violations.
Sonasuman Constech Engineers fined for failing to comply with Section 158 of the Companies Act 2013. Penalty imposed on company & directors for non-compliance.
Sonasuman Constech Engineers Pvt Ltd penalized for violating Sections 134(1) and 134(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for non-signing of financial statements.
Regional Director reduced penalty on auditor of Supreme Gridtech Pvt. Ltd. from ₹70,000 to ₹35,000 for non-compliance under Companies Act, 2013.
Adjudication order imposing penalties for non-compliance with Section 134(3)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. Total penalty: ₹4,00,000. Learn more.
The ROC Kerala imposed penalties on Saint Philomenas Nidhi Ltd for violating the Companies Act provisions related to Director Identification Numbers.
Penalty imposed on Moneshi Agro Industries for failing to file financial statements within the required timeframe under the Companies Act, 2013.
