Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Madhyamam Technologies Limited faces penalties for late filing of significant beneficial ownership under Section 90 of the Companies Act. Learn about the adjudication order.
Anheuser Busch InBev India penalized ₹1,50,000 for violating Section 118 of the Companies Act, 2013, related to secretarial standards in Board meetings.
The MCA fined Anheuser Busch InBev India ₹1.5 lakh for non-compliance with Section 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding secretarial standards from FY 2020–2023.
Surging Spring Technology Pvt. Ltd. faces penalties for violating Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, following non-maintenance of its registered office.
Registrar of Companies, Puducherry penalized Mahe Royal Travancore Nidhi Ltd. and its directors for failing to maintain a registered office under Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Registrar of Companies penalizes Chimsen Technology ₹8 lakh for delayed SBO declaration under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Payment due within 90 days.
Mahatamil Mining and Thermal Energy Ltd appeals against ROC penalties for non-appointment of key managerial personnel under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013.
AML Motors appealed against a penalty for delay in appointing a Company Secretary. The penalty was reduced after considering the unintentional delay in compliance.
Musiri Kamadhenu Nidhi Ltd and directors fined ₹14 lakh by Chennai ROC for violating Sections 117(3)(g) & 179(3)(g) of the Companies Act, 2013, concerning filing of board resolutions related to financial statements.
Macquarie Group Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. penalized under Section 62(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, for non-compliance in rights issue procedures.
