Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : RGPL Commodities Pvt Ltd faces penalties under Section 89(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-6. Total ...
Company Law : GM Elektra Pvt Ltd fined ₹1,88,500 by ROC Mumbai for delayed filing of BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Direct...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies penalizes Paramount Dye Tec Limited for not disclosing trading activity in its MOA, violating Section 4(1)(...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process ...
Company Law : MBL Infrastructure Ltd. faces scrutiny under Section 90 of the Companies Act for non-compliance. Details on adjudicating officer's...
Learn about the penalty imposed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on FERANBRAJ TOLL AND HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Section 15 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Discover the case of M/S FERANBRAJ TOLL AND HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED penalized for non-compliance with Companies Act Section 118(10). Analysis of the penalty imposition and its implications.
During an inquiry replies submitted by company were not on official letterheads, and crucial details like CIN, registered office address, and contact information were missing. This omission constituted a violation of Section 12(3) of Companies Act, 2013.
Learn about the penalty imposed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on FERANBRAJ TOLL AND HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED for violating the Companies Act, 2013.
Introduction: The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 4 lakh on Oliveshine Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited for failing to maintain a registered office, a violation of Section 12(1) read with Section 12(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. This article delves into the details of this penalty and the implications it […]
Explore the penalty imposed on Malwa Remedies Pvt Ltd for violating Section 12 of Companies Act. Detailed analysis, implications & appeal process provided.
Under Section 454, Companies Act, 2013, MCA penalizes Desatan Iron & Steel Private Limited for incomplete meeting minutes. Learn about the case and implications.
MCA imposes Rs. 6 Lakh penalty on M/s Peoples International & Services Pvt Ltd and its directors for failure to file e-Form DIR-12.
Learn about the penalty imposed by MCA on a company for not authenticating board meeting attendance registers. Detailed analysis of the case and implications.
MCA imposes penalties due to unnumbered board meeting attendance sheets. Detailed analysis of the case and imposed penalties.
