Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Delay in Holding of AGM, Violation of para 2.1 of Secretarial Standard-2 (SS-2) read with Section 118(1) of Companies Act, 2013: MCA Imposes Penalty
Read about MCA’s penalty of Rs. 7 lakh on Best & Crompton Engineering Projects for not keeping Register of Directors & KMPs as per Companies Act, 2013.
The MCA penalizes Best & Crompton Engineering Projects Limited Rs. 7 lakh for failing to appoint independent directors as required under Section 149(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process outlined by ROC Jaipur.
The MCA imposes a Rs. 2 lakh penalty on Arasu & Arunachalam CA Firm for non-filing of e-form ADT-3 for resignation. Learn about the adjudication order and its implications.
Explore the adjudication order under Section 134(3)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 for Janaki Ram Steel & Power Pvt Ltd. Understand the violations, penalties, and final decision by the Adjudicating Officer.
MCA imposes penalties on Best & Crompton Engineering Projects Ltd. for failing to constitute an Audit Committee from FY 2014-15 to 2019-20. Learn more here.
Explore the adjudication order by Registrar of Companies, Chennai, on Bluemax Capital Solutions Pvt Ltd under Section 4(1)(d) of Companies Act, 2013. Details, penalties, and compliance requirements.
The ROC Chennai imposes a penalty on Janaki Ram Steel & Power Ltd. for non-compliance with Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013. Read the detailed adjudication order.
Bluemax Capital Solution Private Limited fined Rs. 13.5 Lakh by MCA for not disclosing company’s affairs in the Director’s Report for FY 2015-18. Detailed adjudication inside.
