CA, CS, CMA : Explore the implications of the inclusion of practicing professionals like CAs, CSs, and CWAs under the Prevention of Money-Launde...
Income Tax : Discover the FAQs on issues in filing Tax Audit Report Form 3CA-CD/3CB-CD. Learn about prerequisites, process, and more....
Goods and Services Tax : Hon’ble SC has in the case of UNION OF INDIA & ORS v/s M/S VISHNU AROMA POUCHING PVT. LTD. & ANR in SPECIAL LEAVE PETITI...
Income Tax : How much Vivad would be closed and how much Vishwas the Vivad se Vishwas scheme will be able to achieve that in coming months woul...
Income Tax : As mark of celebration of 159th Income Tax Day on 24th July,2019, CBDT in a mega event to be held in Delhi to be graced by Hon’b...
Income Tax : Addressing glitches in ITD portal, the Association of Tax Lawyers requests an extension for the ITR filing deadline due to signifi...
CA, CS, CMA : Members & Students Services (Grievances Handling and e-Sahaayataa) Directorate The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India...
Income Tax : We are drawing your kind attention towards Proposed Amendment in Section 43B of The Income Tax Act, 1961, which is detrimental to ...
Income Tax : CBDT proposes to introduce a common ITR by merging all the existing returns of income except ITR-7. However, the current ITR-1 and...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification regarding time limit for certain compliances pursuant to issuance of Notification No. 18/2022-Central Tax dated 28.0...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat HC rules no GST on transfer of leasehold rights as it constitutes immovable property transfer; ITC inapplicable. Key relie...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of the ITAT Bangalore decision in Goworamma Lingappa Manjula Vs ITO. Understand the implications and...
Income Tax : Explore the ITAT Bangalore's decision in Lakshmi Multipurpose Co-operative Vs ITO regarding income threshold limits under Section ...
Corporate Law : Explore Delhi High Court's landmark verdict in Union of India vs. Kiran Kanojia. Insights into National Litigation Policy, its im...
Income Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes Section 263 order and imposes cost of Rs 10,000 on PCIT for lack of proper opportunity. Analysis of t...
Income Tax : CBDT removes anomaly in Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, allowing appeals filed after 22nd July 2024 within the prescribed time to be elig...
Income Tax : Understand CBDT's recent clarifications on trust audit reports. Learn about substantial contributions, relatives, and concerns in...
CA, CS, CMA : Government notifies that following transactions done by CA, CS & CMA on behalf of their client will be covered under Preventio...
Company Law : NFRA's investigations inter-alia revealed that CDGL's Auditors for FY 2018-19 failed to meet relevant requirements of Standards on...
Company Law : Instances of non-compliance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind ASs) on Accounting Policies for measurement of Revenue from Cont...
It is an admitted fact that the assessee has changed the method of depreciation from straight line method to written down value method. Deprecation has been calculated in accordance with the new method from the date of assets coming into use.
In the case of Cardinal Drugs Pvt Ltd.Hon’ble ITAT has observed that there was no scope for the A.O. to have resorted to the provision of Section 154 of the Act for the purpose of enhancing the income of the assessee.by stating as under:- The A.O. on long drawn process of reasoning should not have passed the order under Section154 of the Act. The issue raised by the A.O. in proceeding under Section 154 of the Act is highly debatable which requires the issue to be reconsidered by the A.O.about applicability of the provision of Section 115JB of the Act which was notraised by the A.O. in assessment or appellate proceedings.
Agra ITAT in the case of ACIT Vs. Shri Yogendra Kumar Singhal has held that Quality & lavishness of construction is not incriminating material. Reference cannot be made to the Valuation Officer in the absence of incriminating material/document found during the course of search
Hon’ble ITAT Agra in the case of ACIT V/s. Kalyani Chaturvedi held that Re-appreciation of seized material in subsequent proceedings by the AO is unjustified and quashed the Re-assessment Order. Hon’ble ITAT has held as under
ALLAHABAD High Court Rejects Revenue’s denial of Sec 80G(5) recognition on the ground that the assessee-trust did not commence one of the activities mentioned in object clause- The fact that the assessee was still to commence the activity of establishing a hospital for imparting medical treatment would not by itself result in the rejection of the claim for recognition.
SC has dismissed the revenue appeal in which the Allahabad High Court had confirmed the ITAT stand of quashing the assessment order on the ground that the assessment order in the name of individuals could not be made when the warrant of authorisation was issued in the joint names of Ashok Chawla, Smt. Madhu Chawla and Shri Anuj Chawla.
Section 50C is not final determination to prove that it is a case of escapement of income. The report of approved valuer may give estimated figure on the basis of facts of each case. Therefore, on mere applicability of section 50C would not disclose any escapement of income in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Facts of the case in brief are that the assessee filed his return of income belatedly on 26/03/2010 showing taxable income of Rs. 6,03,414/-, which was processed under section 143(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act, for short on 05/04/2010.
