Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Indus Power Tech Inc. Vs Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has determined that a company cannot be restrained from conducting its business following the termination of a contract, emphasizing that non-compete clauses do not provide grounds for injunctive relief after such termination. The case involved […]
The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institutional arbitration.
Learn about the impact of arbitration clauses in India’s credit card agreements and how they affect consumer rights, dispute resolution, and industry practices.
Explore the pros and cons of Investment Treaty Arbitration compared to domestic courts, analyzing neutrality, enforceability, costs, transparency, and more.
Understand third-party funding in Indian arbitration, its legal challenges, and the need for regulations to improve access and ensure fairness in dispute resolution.
Explore the scope and limits of patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, focusing on judicial scrutiny and landmark case laws in India.
Calcutta High Court held that application for setting aside of an award under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be made after three months from the date of arbitral award. Thus, application made after the time period is barred by limitation.
Delhi High Court rules in Mukesh Udeshi vs Jindal Steel Power Ltd, emphasizing that only parties to arbitration proceedings can challenge an arbitral award.
Explore Delhi High Court’s rulings on arbitration of lock-in periods in employment contracts, with detailed case analyses and legal insights.
The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at GIFT IFSC to IFSCA, focusing on efficient dispute resolution.
