Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Docket Care Systems Vs Hariwill Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 No. 29 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Docket Care Systems Vs Hariwill Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12th March, 2024 passed by Commercial Court, Court No. 2, Lucknow whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed for failure to pre-deposit the amount to the extent of 75% in terms of provisions of Section 19 of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short, ‘Act of 2006’).

2. The appellant aggrieved of the award dated 07th October, 2023 passed by the MSME Council, filed petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Commercial Court, Lucknow. Along with the petition, an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit as required under Section 19 of the Act of 2006 was filed. The application seeking waiver came to be dismissed by order dated 19th February, 2024 inter-alia relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tirupati Steels Vs. Shubh Industrial Component and Another; (2022) 7 SCC 429.

3. The Court while dismissing the application, directed the appellant to deposit the 75% of the awarded amount within three weeks and ordered that failing which the Misc. Case shall stand dismissed by itself. On the same day, i.e. 19th February, 2024, another order was passed based on the determination already made indicating deposit of the 75% of the awarded amount within a period of three weeks and failure thereof would result in dismissal of the pending proceedings.

4. When the matter came up before the Commercial Court on 12th March, 2024, an application was attempted to be filed by the appellant seeking further time to deposit the amount in compliance of the order dated 19.02.2024 wherein it was indicated that the applicant has applied for loan/overdraft from the Bank which is still under process and therefore four weeks’ time may be granted for doing the needful in terms of the order dated 19.02.2024. Reliance was placed in this regard on judgments in Goodyear India Ltd. Vs. Norton Intech Rubbers Pvt. Ltd. and Another; 2012 (6) SCC 345 and Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority Vs. Aska Equipments Ltd. 2022 (1) SCC 61. However, it is submitted that the application was not even received/entertained by the Commercial Court and on 12th March, 2024, the impugned order was passed inter-alia noticing the fact that 75% of the awarded amount has not been deposited and consequently dismissed the petition.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031