Corporate Law : Explore the necessity of expanding access to international arbitration, its benefits, challenges, and implications for global disp...
Corporate Law : Exploring Game Theory in International Arbitration & Third-Party Funding: A Strategic Analysis. Delve into the nuances of funding ...
Corporate Law : Learn about mediation settlement agreements, their importance, components, advantages, and drawbacks. Understand their enforceabil...
Corporate Law : Explore the intricacies of time limits in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Understand the impact of t...
Corporate Law : Exploring the role of Public International Law in development of Investment Treaty Arbitration Rules. Learn how PIL influences the...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Delhi high court has held that the foreign arbitration award in the dispute between US firm Penn Racquet Sports and Indian com...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court rules in Mukesh Udeshi vs Jindal Steel Power Ltd, emphasizing that only parties to arbitration proceedings can ch...
Corporate Law : Explore Delhi High Court's rulings on arbitration of lock-in periods in employment contracts, with detailed case analyses and lega...
Corporate Law : Telangana High Court mandates reasoned decisions in disputes over due amounts under the Arbitration Act. Analysis of PBSAMP Projec...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court's judgment clarifies that IBC proceedings don't preclude court jurisdiction for Section 11 applications under the...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC mandates Central Registrar to appoint an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act in a di...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Held that provisions of section 11(6) are judicial one and hence principal of opportunity of hearing or putting other party to notice is imperative. In absence of issuance of notice u/s 11 of A&C Act, order and proceedings gets vitiate.
Held that insufficiency of evidence or material is not a ground for setting aside an arbitral award. Income tax return is material evidence to establish the claim.
Bestpay Solutions Private Limited Vs Razorpay Software Private Limited (Karnataka High Court) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:- “A. Pass An Order U/S 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 appointing a sole arbitrator as per agreement dated entered on dated: 18/11/2020 to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, […]
Held that intention of the parties to have their disputes arbitrated and that the same is paramount even where the dispute resolution clauses are vaguely worded or where there is an ambiguity in choice of the mechanism to be adopted.
Held that dispute in respect of ESOP which forms part of the Employment Agreement, would be referable to arbitration as provided in Clause 21 of ESOP.
Held that TDI was not seeking a review, but rather, a discharge/ modification of the conditions prescribed in the said interim order. Accordingly, Arbitral Tribunal was entitled to exercise the said option, having regard to the principles enshrined under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC.
Understanding the enforcement of an arbitration agreement in commercial contracts. Learn how parties can settle disputes out of court through arbitration.
Held that an application u/s. 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator, filed beyond three years, is barred by limitation.
Bombay HC held that Amendment to Section 34 Arbitration Application cannot be allowed if it constitutes a fresh challenge
Possible extent of claim likely to be awarded cannot be a foregone conclusion. Arbitrator fell in error by exercising Section 17 jurisdiction for securing the amount
