The term Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) describes a range of non-litigation-based dispute resolution techniques. It includes procedures that enable parties to reach agreements without resorting to court, such as negotiation, conciliation, arbitration, mediation, and transaction. ADR techniques, sometimes with the assistance of unbiased third parties, seek to promote friendly agreements between opposing parties. Common kinds of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) include mediation, arbitration, and negotiation. Each offers special benefits regarding control, informality, and flexibility in settling issues.[1]
Parties directly negotiate to resolve conflicts while retaining control over the course and result. Through the exploration of underlying interests and communication facilitation, a neutral third party helps disputants find a consensual and non-binding resolution through mediation. Contrarily, arbitration is more like a trial in which an impartial arbiter renders a definitive, legally binding ruling that is comparable to a court decision. Advancing dispute resolution (ADR) offers speed, privacy, and adaptability, which sets it apart from conventional legal procedures.[2]
ADR usually starts with the parties agreeing to employ ADR techniques, which is followed by the establishment of procedural guidelines, information sharing, and settlement negotiations. If a settlement is reached, the parties fulfill their obligations and formalize the agreement in a settlement agreement. When parties want to avoid the drawn-out and expensive process of litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can be very helpful since it provides a more cooperative and effective means of settling conflicts.[3]
The various types of ADR mechanisms are arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and Lok Adalat. The concept of mediation in India has been dealt with under the statute Mediation Act 2023, this act received the president’s assent on 14th September 2023. [4]
Parties in disagreement meet with the mediator, an impartial third party, to settle their differences through mediation, a flexible method of resolving conflicts. The hands-on, task-oriented, and structured nature of mediation enables each party to voice their opinions in a polite manner. By monitoring the information flow and assisting the parties in finding common ground, addressing irrational expectations, and drafting a final settlement, the mediator helps the parties resolve their differences.
When a relationship is strained but needs to continue, mediation is a suitable way to resolve the conflict, especially in civil cases. Although laws, regulations, or court orders may mandate involvement in particular jurisdictions and subject topics, the procedure is often voluntary. Small claims courts, family courts, housing courts, some criminal court programs, and neighborhood justice centers all frequently use mediation.
Compared to formal litigation, the mediation process is typically quicker, less expensive, and easier to follow. If a settlement is achieved, mediation agreements may be written or verbal, and state laws will determine whether they can be enforced. If a mediation agreement is in writing and both parties sign it, most mediation agreements are regarded as legally binding contracts. If a settlement conference is not held, the parties may take their claims to other forums. [5]
Instead of concentrating on specific issues of right or wrong, mediation enables the parties to address the underlying circumstances that gave rise to the conflict. The wants, rights, and interests of the parties are the main focus of this party-centered process. To help the parties communicate and advance understanding, the mediator employs a wide range of strategies.
Legally binding contracts that specify the terms and circumstances that all parties to a dispute have agreed upon are mediation settlement agreements. To guarantee their legitimacy and enforcement, they are signed by each mediator. The agreement made throughout the mediation process is formalized and documented with each party’s signature, indicating their acknowledgment and consent to the conditions of the settlement. The settlement agreement is not enforceable without the signatures of all parties and is subject to challenge or invalidation. While mediation agreements can be utilized in a range of contexts, such as family, community, and workplace issues, mediation settlement agreements are frequently employed in judicial processes. The primary distinction between the two is their degree of enforceability; settlement agreements are enforceable and legally binding, whereas mediation agreements may or may not be enforceable under certain conditions. All parties should carefully read and sign mediation settlement agreements to ensure they understand and agree to the conditions.
In the Mediation Act of 2023, section 19, section 20, and section 21 of the act deal with concept mediation settlement agreements.
Section 19: Mediation Settlement Agreement
Section 20: Registration of mediation settlement agreement
Section 21: Non Setellement Report [6]
Page Contents
- Section 19: Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Section 20 Registration of Mediated Settlement Agreement
- Section 21 Non-Settlement Report
- Advantages of Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Disadvantages of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Advantages of Non-Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Disadvantages of Non-Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Conclusion
- References
Section 19: Mediation Settlement Agreement
The Mediation settlement agreement should consist of-
- In writing
- May be between all or some parties
- Settling some or all disputes
- Authenticated by mediators
- Signed by all parties voluntarily[7]
The terms of the mediated settlement agreement may extend beyond the scope of the disputes referred to mediation unlike section 16 of the arbitration and conciliation act of 1996 which restricts or strictly confined to the issues directly referred to arbitration. Therefore it facilitates holistic and comprehensive resolution.
Mediation settlement agreement shall be reduced to writing and signed by parties. Mediation settlement agreement shall be submitted to the mediator, he with his signature on the covering letter shall submit it to the mediation service provider and parties in institutional mediation otherwise only to the parties. The parties at times during the mediation process make an agreement with respect to dispute which is a subject matter of mediation. Mediation settlement agreement also includes a settlement agreement resulting from online mediation.
Section 20 Registration of Mediated Settlement Agreement
- The parties have an option to register the mediation settlement agreement. The registration of the mediation settlement agreement should be made within 182 days of the mediation process.
- The mediation settlement agreement can be registered after the expiry of the prescribed period by payment of certain considerations.
- After the registration mediation authority shall issue a unique registration number. This shall exist for the purposes of the record. The mediation act does not specify the implications of non-registration.
- The mediation settlement agreement should be registered within the territorial jurisdiction of the court or tribunal.
- Anything mentioned in this act shall not affect anything contained under section 27 and section 28 of the mediation act 2023. [8]
Section 21 Non-Settlement Report
- If the parties have not arrived at a mediation settlement agreement even after 182 days of the time period and also after an extra 60 days of the time period mentioned under section 18 of the Mediation Act of 2023.
- The mediator shall be of the view that no settlement is possible and therefore the mediator would provide the non-settlement report to the mediation service provider or the parties. [9]
Advantages of Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- Greater control on the outcome of registration of mediation settlement agreement ensures that the parties keep up with the settlement that they have come up with after the dispute.
- The non-performance of anything mentioned in the mediation settlement agreement shall lead to a breach of contract according to the Indian Contract Act 1872.
- The registration of mediation settlement agreements ensures that there exists clarity in the minds of people.
- There shall exist judicial or lawful evidence for the judicial proceedings.
- There shall be an official record of this dispute resolution.
Disadvantages of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- The key concept or concern of mediation proceedings is maintaining confidentiality and registration of the mediation settlement report shall violate the confidentiality clause.
- The mediation process rather than being a cost-effective process shall be a expensive process.
- The mediation process is a less time-consuming process and not a time-consuming process, therefore the registration of the mediation settlement agreement will turn into a time-consuming process.
Advantages of Non-Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- There exists flexibility without registration, the parties can tailor the settlement agreement to specific needs rather than adhering to formal legal requirements.
- Confidentiality is maintained as non-registration of mediation agreement helps in keeping the agreement private and not a part of the public record.
- The non-registration is a cost-efficient process as non-registration saves on the money associated with filing and documenting legal documents.
- The non-registration of the mediation process is a time-saving process. Avoiding the registration process can the finalization of settlement allowing parties to move forward quickly.
Disadvantages of Non-Registration of Mediation Settlement Agreement
- In legal disputes unregistered agreements may not hold the same weight as the registered agreements making it difficult to agree upon the terms.
- Limited evidentiary value during the judicial proceedings.
- There are high chance that the parties may later dispute the terms or attempt to modify them without the parties’ consent.
- Lack of public record
Conclusion
Mediation settlement agreements are crucial instruments for settling conflicts quickly, affordably, and amicably. These contracts, which are legally binding and set forth the terms and conditions that all parties to a dispute have agreed upon, guarantee the validity and enforceability of the settlement reached. All parties acknowledge and concur with the conditions of the settlement by signing the agreement, which serves to formalize and record the decision made during the mediation process.
The degree of enforceability is the primary distinction between a mediation agreement and a settlement agreement. Settlement agreements are legally enforceable and binding, but mediation agreements may or may not be enforceable under certain conditions. Signing the settlement agreement and providing all necessary information—such as the parties’ names, the resolution’s contents, the date of the signature, consideration, the governing law, dispute resolution clauses, and termination clauses will ensure that it is legally binding and enforceable.
A collaborative approach to dispute resolution, quicker resolution, reduced expenses, secrecy, flexibility, and enhanced relationships are just a few advantages of mediation settlement agreements. These agreements also foster greater understanding between parties in disagreement and provide parties more power over the result. Nonetheless, issues with enforcement may occur because of things like fraud, a shift in perspective, or unclear material terms. To avoid disagreements over enforcement, it is essential to guarantee accurate paperwork, authority, and compliance with legal standards.
In conclusion, mediation settlement agreements provide an organised and efficient means of reaching mutually accepted solutions while minimising expenses and maintaining relationships. They are crucial for settling conflicts quickly, cheaply, and amicably. It is essential to comprehend the components, advantages, and possible drawbacks of these agreements in order to resolve conflicts through mediation successfully.
References
1. University Of North Florida, https://www.unf.edu/deanofstudents/resolution/about-adr.html.
2. Program On negotiation, Harvard Law School, by Katie Shonk on April 4th, 2024 https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/what-is-alternative-dispute-resolution/.
3. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/1994/05/alternative-dispute-resolution-why-it-doesnt-work-and-why-it-does.
4. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mediation.
5. Mediation Act 2023.
[1] University Of North Florida, https://www.unf.edu/deanofstudents/resolution/about-adr.html.
[2] Programme on negotiation, Harvard Law School, by Katie Shonk on April 4th, 2024 https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/what-is-alternative-dispute-resolution/.
[3] Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/1994/05/alternative-dispute-resolution-why-it-doesnt-work-and-why-it-does.
[4] Mediation Act 2023.
[5] Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mediation.
[6] Supra Note 4.
[7] Section 19 Mediation Act 2023.
[8] Section 20 Mediation Act 2023.
[9] Section 21 Mediation Act 2023.