Corporate Law : Explore the necessity of expanding access to international arbitration, its benefits, challenges, and implications for global disp...
Corporate Law : Exploring Game Theory in International Arbitration & Third-Party Funding: A Strategic Analysis. Delve into the nuances of funding ...
Corporate Law : Learn about mediation settlement agreements, their importance, components, advantages, and drawbacks. Understand their enforceabil...
Corporate Law : Explore the intricacies of time limits in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Understand the impact of t...
Corporate Law : Exploring the role of Public International Law in development of Investment Treaty Arbitration Rules. Learn how PIL influences the...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Delhi high court has held that the foreign arbitration award in the dispute between US firm Penn Racquet Sports and Indian com...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court rules in Mukesh Udeshi vs Jindal Steel Power Ltd, emphasizing that only parties to arbitration proceedings can ch...
Corporate Law : Explore Delhi High Court's rulings on arbitration of lock-in periods in employment contracts, with detailed case analyses and lega...
Corporate Law : Telangana High Court mandates reasoned decisions in disputes over due amounts under the Arbitration Act. Analysis of PBSAMP Projec...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court's judgment clarifies that IBC proceedings don't preclude court jurisdiction for Section 11 applications under the...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC mandates Central Registrar to appoint an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act in a di...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Though at first glance insolvency and arbitration appear opposed, there are some circumstances when the two intersect sufficiently to warrant either legislative action or, failing that, judicial reflection.
Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mohit Raghuram Hegde Proprietor Creative Infotech (Bombay High Court) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court held that mere valid arbitration clause exist in “terms and conditions” as mentioned in the website and mere allegation of fraud would not vitiate the constitution of arbitral […]
Held that there is no dispute that the work order was issued by the respondent but stamp duty on the same is not paid. Accordingly, arbitration clause would be non-existent in law and unenforceable till stamp duty is adjudicated and paid.
Held that allegation of collusion between the arbitrator and the opposite party cannot be decided in an application filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
HC Held that order passed under section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be challenged under section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Held that section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is an exception to Section 42. However, if Section 8 is also brought within the ambit of Section 42, it would defeat the sublime philosophy underlining arbitration i.e., party autonomy.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court observed that in no manner under Commercial Courts Act, the Jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 11 has been either disturbed or divested in matters of appointment of an arbitral tribunal as provided for under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Arbitrator has discretion to grant post-award interest. Section 37(1)(b) does not fetter discretion of arbitrator to grant post-award interest
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India invoked Article 142 of the Constitution of India and have directed to form new arbitral Tribunal due to disputes in the fee structure provided in IV Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Held that in a case where there exists an arbitration agreement, the court is under obligation to refer the parties to arbitration in terms of the arbitration agreement.
