Company Law : CCFS-2026 permits eligible delayed ROC filings at reduced additional fees but does not remove AGM default under sections 96 and 99...
Company Law : This guide provides a complete AGM compliance tracker covering pre-AGM, AGM-day, post-AGM, and IEPF obligations under the Companie...
Company Law : The FAQ clarifies that the Companies Act, 2013 does not restrict adjournment of a duly convened and commenced AGM. An adjourned AG...
Company Law : FAQs explaining AGM requirements, timelines, extensions, venue rules, and compliance under the Companies Act, 2013, including prov...
Company Law : MCA has confirmed that extension of annual filing timelines till 31st December 2025 does not extend statutory deadline for holding...
CA, CS, CMA : ICSI requests SEBI to dispense with physical copies of Notices and Annual Reports for listed entities, promoting efficiency and en...
Company Law : ICSI appeals for AGM date extension to 30th September 2024 and rule amendments to facilitate virtual meetings. Details and analysi...
Company Law : Institute of Company Secretaries of India MCA: 2022 | April 26,2022 Shri Rajesh Verma, IAS Secretary Ministry of Corporate Affairs...
CA, CS, CMA : This is to inform you that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (Registrar of Companies of various States) vide its Order dated 23.09...
Company Law : ACAE Request for extension of timelines for holding Annual General Meeting (AGM) under the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Y...
Company Law : ROC Kolkata held that incorrect disclosure of AGM and AGM due dates in Form AOC-4 constituted a violation of Rule 8(3). The compan...
Company Law : Omission of required attachments in annual return filing resulted in penalties under Section 450. The decision stresses the import...
Company Law : The authority held that financial statements adopted before audit are invalid under the Companies Act. It ruled that failure to fi...
Company Law : Non-adherence to Secretarial Standard-2 in maintaining AGM minutes resulted in penalties on the company and its officers. The auth...
Company Law : The authority found that approving financial statements before obtaining the Secretarial Audit Report contravened statutory requir...
CCFS-2026 permits eligible delayed ROC filings at reduced additional fees but does not remove AGM default under sections 96 and 99 of the Companies Act.
This guide provides a complete AGM compliance tracker covering pre-AGM, AGM-day, post-AGM, and IEPF obligations under the Companies Act and SEBI LODR Regulations. It helps listed companies comply with statutory timelines and avoid regulatory lapses.
The FAQ clarifies that the Companies Act, 2013 does not restrict adjournment of a duly convened and commenced AGM. An adjourned AGM is treated as a continuation of the original meeting rather than a fresh meeting.
ROC Kolkata held that incorrect disclosure of AGM and AGM due dates in Form AOC-4 constituted a violation of Rule 8(3). The company and certifying director were penalised despite describing the error as a clerical mistake.
Omission of required attachments in annual return filing resulted in penalties under Section 450. The decision stresses the importance of accurate and complete filings.
The authority held that financial statements adopted before audit are invalid under the Companies Act. It ruled that failure to file proper statements attracts penalty under Section 137.
Non-adherence to Secretarial Standard-2 in maintaining AGM minutes resulted in penalties on the company and its officers. The authority rejected claims of procedural lapses being minor or inadvertent. The case emphasizes the binding nature of secretarial standards under company law.
FAQs explaining AGM requirements, timelines, extensions, venue rules, and compliance under the Companies Act, 2013, including provisions for OPCs and ROC extensions.
The authority found that approving financial statements before obtaining the Secretarial Audit Report contravened statutory requirements. A monetary penalty was imposed with compliance directions.
The authority held that filing an e-form with wrong particulars constitutes a completed contravention. Later requests to mark the form as defective do not eliminate penalty liability.
