Service Tax: No Section 78 Penalty without Misrepresentation or Suppression of Facts

Scaria Thomas & Co Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

The case of Scaria Thomas & Co vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) delves into the application of penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act in a service tax matter. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, focusing on the absence of penalties due to the absence of misrepresentation or suppression of facts.

1. Backgro

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.