Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federation Limited Vs The Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federation Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) Facts- M/s Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited is registered as an Apex Society under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 for implementation of ‘Operation Milk Flood’ in the State. The District Milk Cooperative Societies and the milk unions formed under the same Act are members of the appellant Apex Society. The appellant is responsible for planning policies, financial resource mobilization and management, liaison with agencies of the State and Central Government, financing ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. vswami says:

    INSTANT (:
    The subject development , not for the first time of its kind, must be taken a conscious note of by one and all who have been claiming exemption from taxation (direct tax or indirect tax )relying on /invoking the OVERRIDING COMMON LAW PRINCIPLE OF MUTUALITY .

    Of course, the other category of persons, who nonetheless, based on mainly external advice of any professional, out of over enthusiasm , volunteered to and conceded taxability, impudently so, -for instance, HOUSING ASSOCATIONS,- make for a different ‘kettle of fish’. For, strictly viewed, and to do some plain- speaking, those who have done so- who may be , according to information personally gathered, a mere minority, opted to , though avoidable, jumped into a kettle of boiling water. And, because of doing so, that must be regarded as a self-defeating thoughtless action; further, jeopardising the rights and interests of the rest in a majority, lawfully entitled to !?

    All the more importantly, the following four crucial facts call for a special concerted noting:
    1. The reported ORDER has ben passed by the CESTAT ; and
    2. it has been delivered by the Appellate TRUIBUNAL on 09-05-2022;
    3. in deciding the point of issue against the Revenue, the case law quoted as a PRECEDENT have been followed, with no qualms or reservation; and
    4. last but not least , among the PRECEDENT so followed, are the court decisions in the cases of, –

    …”b) Commissioner of Service Tax,Bangalore Vs. Sobha Developers
    Ltd.
    c) Ootacamund Club, Ootty Vs. Additional Commissioner,
    Coimbatore;
    d) Commissioner of Service Tax, DelhiIII Vs. Manufacturers Association
    for Information Technology;…”

    #development #law #tax #comment #pr #reference

    Attention is yet again drawn to the related Pr, Posts wprt the Amendment of the GST law ; that too with retrospective effect from the date of coming into force of the GST Act.
    For a quick reference , suggest to look up the related earlier posted comments of direct relevance.

    KEY takeaway: Ootacamund Club, Ootty , as earlier pinpointed / shared, is a Club which has challenged the 2021 Amendment of the GST law as ultra vires the Constitution in a WRIT filed in the Madras H.C.. While there is so far NO information about its present status, going by one’s reasonable guess and honest expectation, similar steps might likewise have been taken by hundreds of those , not barring housing associations, who are impacted by the highly questionable/contestable amendment of the law.
    Courtesy
    (in the larger PUBLIC INTEREST- with a sincere intent to create an awareness among / alert the most gullible of the impacted lot)

    (Unfinished; PENDING /INVITE to EDIT )

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930