Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs Shiva Builders (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Even higher liability of the assessee had to be treated to be in issue before the Commissioner (Appeals). Thus, exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 84(4) of the Finance Act, 1994 when appeal had been preferred was not permissible. The view taken by the Tribunal is consistent with above statutory provision. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STA No. 51 of 2010 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs SHIVA BUILDERS Dated: April 6, 2011 Appeal dismissed. JUDGEMENT Per: Adarsh Kumar Goel: 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031