This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Service tax demands cannot be imposed solely on ITR/26AS statements: CESTAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gopi Chenna Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal - GST (CESTAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Gopi Chenna Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal – GST (CESTAT Hyderabad)
Introduction: The CESTAT Hyderabad recently passed a crucial order on two appeals, ST/30412/2023 & ST/30454/2023, involving GopiChenna and SIS Teleservices Pvt Ltd. Both cases had identical issues and were heard together. The appeals centered around service tax demands based on discrepancies in income tax returns and service tax returns.
Background:
Two companies, M/s GopiChenna and M/s SIS Teleservices Pvt Ltd., challenged service tax demands raised by the authorities. The department based ...
Author Info
