Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Namrata Advertising Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urvashi Porwal Brief of the Case In the case of Namrata Advertising Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik, it was held that creating infrastructure, displaying the advertisement and collecting rent for such display will not fall under the activity of advertising agency. Facts of the Case The Appellant is undertaking an advertising business as well as creating infrastructure like stand for display of advertisements at various places for the clients. The appellant herein is taking certain prominent places in the city on rental basis, and then installing an infrastructure, including boards th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930