Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Luxmi Township Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Luxmi Township Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that one time payment, in the form of Premium or Salami for transfer of interest in the property cannot be equated as rent and hence the same is not exigible to the service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax set aside. Facts- The Appellant are engaged, inter alia, in the business of setting up of modern Townships which include infrastructure and support facilities. The Appellant obtained permission from Government of West Bengal to occupy land for the purpose of setting up of a satellite Township....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930