Case Law Details
Case Name : Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH
Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd.
V/s.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II
STAY ORDER NO. ST/S/533/2012-CUS
APPLICATION NO. ST/STAY/2761/2011-CUS
APPEAL NO. ST/1309/2011-CUS
APRIL 16, 2012
ORDER
Mathew John, Technical Member
The Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of VP sugar and molasses. For their manufacturing activity, they collected sugarcane from farmers at various collection centres. They engaged individual farmers for transportation of sugarcane from collection centres to the factory and paid charges for such transportation. The...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
I want to share expErt suggeStions and hire authorities decision in regard of SERVICE PROVIDED BY PERSON WHO DOES NOT ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE IS NOT TAXABLE
HI SIR…………
THANKS FOR SHARING………………
AS PER THIS OPINION IT’S NOT COMPULSORY TO ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE BY THE TRANSPORTER OF GOODS BY ROAD EVEN THOUGH IT’S MENTIONED UNDER RULE 4B OF THE SERVICE TAX RULES.IT WILL BECOME SIMPLE FOR THEM NOT FALL IN THE CRITERIA BY NOT ISSUING THE CONSIGNMENT NOTE.EVEN IT’S NOT MENTIONED UNDER RULE 4B THAT FOR WHOM IT’S MANDATORY TO ISSUE CONSIGNMENT NOTE.SO IT’S BIG LOOPHOLE UNDER THE SERVICE TAX FOR GTA AND MOST OF THE GOODS TRANSPORT AGENCY AND SERVICE RECEIVER TAKING THE BIGGEST ADVANTAGE OF THIS LOOPHOLE.