Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Team HR Services Private Ltd Vs Union of India & Anr (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 13114/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Team HR Services Private Ltd Vs Union of India & Anr (Delhi High Court)

The issue under consideration is relating to the writ petition filed for seeking refund of pre-deposit of Service Tax  alongwith interest. Question is whether petitioner will get the refund or not?

In the present case, the officers of the Service Tax Commissionerate conducted an audit or investigation and a deposit of Rs. 2,38,00,000/- was made by the petitioner under protest, under pressure from the officers during the audit/investigation of the service tax records, as the officers insisted on the deposit by the petitioner, even without issuing any notice to show cause to the petitioner. The Service Tax Department issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner, demanding service tax of Rs.4,66,39,061/- for the period, admitting that the petitioner there out of had already deposited Rs.2,38,00,000/- under protest. The Commissioner (Adjudication) Service Tax passed the order in respect of the show cause notice, confirming the demand with interest and penalty and appropriated the amount of Rs.2,38,00,000/- aforesaid towards the same.

High Court states that, the counsel for the respondents has only placed before us what is recorded in the final rejection refund order but reasoning wherein is illogical and contrary to the expected conduct from the State and unjustifiable. The said order does not disclose any ground or statutory provision whereunder the respondents State are entitled to retain the said amount of Rs.2,38,00,000/-. It is thus not as if, HC ought not to exercise their implicit discretion in exercising writ jurisdiction for the reason of any statutory remedy being available to the petitioner. When it is so and when the reasons disclosed in the order refusing refund are found to be illogical and de hors the statutory provision and further when it is found that the respondents State are illegally withholding money, a case for issuing a mandamus as sought is made out.

Hence HC passed the order stating that the respondents are expected to at least now, on or before 15th July, 2020 refund the amount of Rs.2,38,00,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from 1st November, 2006 to 31st May, 2018 and with interest @ 7.5% per annum from 1st June, 2018 till the date of refund on or before 31st July, 2020. However, if the said amount is not refunded by 15th July, 2020, the rate of interest with effect from 1st August, 2020 shall stand enhanced to 12% per annum. A mandamus to the said effect is issued to the respondents GST Department.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031