This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deposit insurance activity of DICGC falls within ambit of ‘General Insurance Business’
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai held that the deposit insurance activity of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation, Mumbai (DICGC) falls within the ambit of section 65(105)(d) of the Finance Act, 1994 and is chargeable to Service Tax under “General Insurance Business”.
Facts- The assessee (M/s. Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation i.e DICGC) is a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which was established under the Deposit Insurance Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Act, 1961 for the pur...
Author Info
