Case Law Details
Case Name : Madras Cements Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CESTAT, BANGALORE BENCH
Madras Cements Ltd.
versus
Commissioner of Central Excise
FINAL ORDER NOS. S-335 & 336 OF 2012
APPEAL NOs. E/360 & 361 OF 2010
MAY 29, 2012
ORDER
P.G. Chacko, Judicial Member – In both the appeals filed by the assessee, the short question which arises for consideration is whether the appellant can claim CENVAT credit of service tax paid on GTA service which was availed for clearance of their final products from the place of removal to customers’ premises during the period of dispute. The first appeal is directed against denial of CEN...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Effectually, the cenvat credit on the outbound service of GTA equals that of duty payable on the transportation component of product price. Hence, to avoid disagreement it would be beneficial to avoid claiming cenvat on GTA.
Dear Sir,
Whether Cenvat Benefits to Cement Plant on Transportaion from 1. Factory to Consumer 2. Railway Siding to Godown 3. Depot to Consumer.Can we avail Cenvat Benefits on this condition?
Please guide me