Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Summary: The SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (PIT Regulations) define “Unpublished Price Sensitive Information” (UPSI) as any non-public information related to a company or its securities that, if made public, can materially affect security prices. Insider trading regulations prohibit insiders—defined as connected persons or those with access to UPSI—from sharing or trading based on such information, except for legitimate purposes or legal obligations. Violations of Regulation 3(1) (prohibition of communication of UPSI) or Regulation 4(1) (prohibition of trading on UPSI) result in penalties under Section 15G and directions under Section 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992. Penalties can range from ₹10 lakh to ₹25 crore or three times the profit gained, whichever is higher. SEBI Act’s Section 12A prohibits trading or aiding insider trading and mandates that any breach of the PIT Regulations also violates this section. Information is considered “generally available” only when accessible to the public on a non-discriminatory basis. SEBI has broad powers under Section 11B to issue directives or impose penalties to protect investors and maintain market integrity. The PIT Regulations, 2015, replaced the earlier 1992 regulations to provide a stricter framework for insider trading and its associated liabilities.

Regulation 2(1)(n) of the PIT Regulations defines the term UPSI to mean any  information  relating  to  the  company  or  its  securities  that  is generally  not  available which upon  becoming generally  available is likely to materially affect the price of the securities. Thus, from a plain reading of the said definition under the PIT  Regulations,  it  can  be  seen  that the  regulations  have  without  any  ambiguity defined  the  said  term  to  cover  under  its  ambit  any information pertaining  to  the Company or its securities which, upon becoming public, is likely to make an impact on  the  price  of  such  securities  would  be  treated  as  UPSI. The definition is an ‘inclusive’ definition which enlists certain ‘information’ which can be treated  as ‘price  sensitive’ until  the  same  is  not  generally  available.  Regulation 2(1)(e) of the PIT Regulations defines the term “generally available information” to mean an information that is accessible to the public on a non-discriminatory basis. Regulation 2(1)(g) of the PIT Regulations defines the term ‘insider’, to mean, any person who is:

  • a connected person; or
  • in possession of or having access to unpublished price sensitive information

The  ‘Note’ to  the  said  definition  specifically  clarifies  that as “generally available information” is  defined (under  the  PIT  Regulations),  it  is  intended  that  anyone  in possession of or having access to the UPSI should be considered as an “insider” regardless of how one came in possession of or had access to such information.

Regulation 3(1) of the PIT Regulation prohibits the communication of any UPSI by an Insider, except if it is in furtherance of some legitimate purpose or in  discharge of any legal obligation. Further, Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations prohibits trading by insiders when in possession of UPSI. As discussed earlier, in terms of Regulation 2(1)(g), an insider can be either a connected person or a person who is in possession of or having access to UPSI. Once a person is found to be having  access  to  UPSI  or  in  possession  of  UPSI,  such  person  also  become  an insider and therefore, is prohibited to trade when in possession of UPSI by virtue of Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations. Possession of UPSI, in respect of persons who are termed insider by virtue of Regulation 2(1)(g)(ii) is not required to be proved separately  while determining the violation  of  Regulation  4(1)  because  a  person becomes ‘insider’ under  Regulation  2(1)(g)(ii)  when  it  is  proved  that  he  was in possession of UPSI or having access to UPSI.

Section  12A  of  the  SEBI  Act,  1992,  as  introduced  by SEBI  (Amendment)  Act,  2002, in  Clause  (d)  provides  that  no person shall directly or indirectly indulge in insider trading. The word “indulge” used in this Clause is of wide import.  This  Clause  seeks  to prohibit  any  assistance/aiding of  insider  trading,  by any person, either directly or indirectly. Section 12A(e) provides that no person shall  directly or indirectly deal in securities while in possession of material or non-public information  or  communicate  such  material  or  non-public  information  to  any  other person, in a manner  which is in contravention of the  provisions of this Act or the rules  or  the  regulations  made  thereunder.  SEBI  (Prohibition  of Insider  Trading) Regulations, 1992 came to be repealed by PIT Regulations, 2015. Thus, at present, ‘regulations’ referred to in Section 12A(e) are PIT Regulations, 2015. Once a person  is found to be in violation of PIT Regulations, 2015, it leads to violation of Section 12A(d) and (e), also.

Violation  of PIT Regulations, 2015 committed  renders   liability  for imposition of penalty under Section 15G read with Section 11B(2) of the SEBI Act, 1992, which provide as under:

“Penalty for insider trading.

15G. If any insider who,

    • either on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, deals in securities of a body corporate listed on any stock exchange on the basis of any unpublished price sensitive information; or
    • communicates any unpublished price-sensitive information to any person, with or without his request for such information except as required in the ordinary course of business or under any law; or
    • counsels, or procures for any other person to deal in any securities of anybody corporate on the basis of unpublished price- sensitive information, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than ten lakh rupees but which may extend to twenty -five  crore  rupees  or  three  times  the  amount  of  profits  made  out  of insider trading, whichever is higher.

Power to issue directions and levy penalty.

11B

(1) Save as otherwise provided in section 11, if after making or causing to be  made an enquiry, the Board is satisfied that it is necessary, —

(i) in the interest of investors, or orderly development of securities market; or 

(ii) to prevent the affairs of any intermediary or other persons referred to in section  12  being  conducted  in  a  manner  detrimental  to  the  interest  of  investors  or securities market; or

(iii) to secure the proper management of any such intermediary or person, it may issue such  directions,

(a) to any person or class of persons referred to in section 12, or associated with the securities market; or

b) to any company in respect of matters specified in section 11A, as may be appropriate in the  interests  of  investors  in  securities  and  the  securities market. 

 Explanation.—

For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the power issue  directions  under  this  section  shall  include and  always  be  deemed  to  have been included the power to direct any person, who made profit or averted loss by

indulging in any transaction or activity in contravention of the provisions of this  Act  or  regulations  made thereunder, to disgorge an amount equivalent to the wrongful gain made or loss averted by such contravention. 

(2) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section (1), sub-section

(4A) of section 11 and section 15-I, the Board may, by an order, for reasons to be recorded in writing, levy penalty under sections 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15EA, 15EB, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA and 15HB after holding an inquiry in the prescribed manner.”

Sponsored

Author Bio

As a multifaceted professional, blending mathematical rigor with legal expertise, I excel at the intersection of finance and law. My journey began with a strong foundation in mathematics and actuarial science, which sparked a fascination with the financial markets. This led me to pursue an LLM in In View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Public Issues vs Private Placement in Capital Raising under Companies Act Analysis of Section 29A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Mixed and Composite Supply under CGST Act, 2017 Statutory Compliances relating to Meetings of a company Landmark Cases on ‘Contempt’ View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930