Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Patanjali Yogpeeth (Nyas) Vs ADIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 2267/Del./2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/02/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2009–10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ground of Appeal-

That the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in holding that the appellant’s activities in relation to ‘propagation of yoga’ does not qualify as providing `medical relief’ or ‘imparting education’, but was purely in the nature of object of general public utility under section 2(15) of the Act.

Held by ITAT

Yoga a form of ‘medical relief’:

One of the primary contentions of the assessing officer/CIT(A) in denying exemption under sections 11/12 of the Act, is that Yoga as a system, does not provide any ‘medical relief, but can at best be categorized as an object of general public utility.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031