This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Share of client pledged by broker cannot be treated as his undisclosed investment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Trustline Securities Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Trustline Securities Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
Held that broker pledged the shares of the clients with banks for obtaining bank finance. It is not justified to take value of shares pledged as undisclosed investment of the broker.
Facts-
The assessee is a company which is a member of National Stock Exchange (“NSE”) and also of Bombay Stock Exchange (“BSE”). It is engaged in the business of share broking and depository service and brokerage from such services.
AO was of the view that the assessee had taken overdraft facility against pledge of shares from Citi Bank an...






