Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT & Anr. Vs. Shkuntla Devi (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Karnataka High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CIT Vs. Shkuntla Devi (Karnataka High Court)
Utilization of capital gains in construction /Purchase of residential house would suffice to claim the benefit of section 54 of the Act irrespective of the fact that transaction not being complete in all respects.
Section 54 makes it explicitly clear that proceeds of sale of the property is to be reinvested within a period of two years, which would not be chargeable to tax. The intention of Legislature was to encourage the investment in the
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Can we claim both the amount of investment in a residential house and the amount deposited in capital gain account under section 54?
Can we claim the amount of investment in a residential house and the amount deposited in capital gain account under section 54?